Skip to main content

Full text of "Etchings"

See other formats


ij  j^ii;'''.';«'t!(.'!>'.iii'U':ini.'i!M't"iii*'  >''',  ''Ma 


Digitized  by  the  Internet  Archive 

in  2008  with  funding  from 

IVIicrosoft  Corporation 


http://www.archive.org/details/etchingsOOnnrrich 


ETCHINGS  OF 

CHARLES  MERYON 


THE      GREAT 


ETCHERS 


^Joti/t^/^,  >yiu^  ile  UZ' '  %iT^^ra.nMri^^. 


ETCHINGS  OF 


/ 


CHARLES  MERYON 


LONDON. GEORGE  NEWNES  LIMITED 
SOUTHAMPTON  STREET  STRAND w.c 
NEW  YORK.CHARLES  SCRIBNERS  SONS 


The  Ballantyne  Press 
Tavistock  St.  London 


GIFT 


LIST  OF  ILLUSTRATIONS 


TOURELLE,   RUE   DE   LA   TIXERANDERIE     Frontispiece 

THE   COW   AND  THE   YOUNG   ASS         .         .         . 

EWE   AND   TWO   LAMBS 

THE   GALLIOT   OF   JAN   DE   VYL   AT   ROTTERDAM 

FROM   HAARLEM   TO   AMSTERDAM 

SOUTH   SEA   FISHERS 

CALAIS   TO   FLUSHING      . 

A   WATER    MILL   NEAR   ST.    DENIS 

ENTRANCE  TO  THE  FAUBOURG  ST.  MARCEAU 
AT   PARIS 

THE  PAVILION  OF  MADEMOISELLE  AND  A  PART 
OF   THE   LOUVRE   AT  PARIS,    1650 

LE   PONT-AU-CHANGE,  ABOUT    1784       . 

OLD   GATEWAY   OF   THE   PALAIS   DE   JUSTICE 

ARMS   SYMBOLICAL   OF  THE   CITY   OF   PARIS 

LE   STRYGE  

LE   PETIT   PONT         .... 

L'ARCHE   DU   PONT   NOTRE    DAME 

LA   GALERIE   DE   NOTRE    DAME    . 

LA   RUE   DES   MAUVAIS   GARCONS 

LA   TOUR   DE   L'HORLOGE 

SAINT-ETIENNE-DU-MONT 

LA   POMPE   NOTRE   DAME,    1852     . 

LE   PONT   NEUF 

LE  PONT-AU-CHANGE 

LA   MORGUE 

L'ABSIDE   DE   NOTRE  DAME    DE   PARIS 

DOORWAY   TO   AN   OLD   HOUSE   AT   BOURGES 

LA    RUE   DES   TOILES,    BOURGES,    1853 

ANCIENNE  HABITATION  A  BOURGES  (THE  MUSI- 
CIAN'S HOUSE)      .... 


PLATS 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

VII 

VIII 

IX 
X 

XI 

XII 

XIII 

XIV 

XV 

XVI 

XVII 

XVIII 

XIX 

XX 

XXI 

XXII 

XXIII 

XXIV 

XXV 

XX/I 

XXVII 


ivi842823 


LIST    OF    ILLUSTRATIONS 


PLATS 


ENTRANCE    TO    THE   CONVENT   OF  THE  FRENCH 

CAPUCINES  AT  ATHENS xxvm 

LA   SALLE    DES   PAS  PERDUS xxix 

LE    PONT    NEUF    ET    LA    SAMARITAINE    VUS    AU- 
DESSOUS  DE  LA  PREMIERE   ARCHE  DU  PONT- 

AU-CHANGE xxx 

THE  RUINS  OF  THE  CHATEAU  OF  PIERREFONDS  xxxi 
TOURELLE,   RUE    DE    L'ECOLE    DE    MEDECINE,    22, 

PARIS,   1 86 1 .         .         .        xxxii 

RUE   DE   CHANTRES,   1862 xxxiii 

COLLEGE  HENRI  IV.  (FIRST  STATE)  ....  xxxiv 
COLLEGE  HENRI  IV.  (LAST  STATE)  ....  xxxv 
BAIN   FROID  CHEVRIER,  DIT   DE   LECOLE,  1864  .       xxxvt 

LE   MINISTERE    DE   LA   MARINE,    1865  ...      xxxvii 

NEW   ZEALAND.     NATIVE     BARNS    AND    HUTS    AT 

AKAROA,  1845 xxxviii 

NEW   CALEDONIA.     A  NATIVE  HUT  ON  THE   ROAD 

FROM   BALLORDE   TO   POEPO,   1845         .         .         .       xxxix 
OCEANIA.  « PECHE   AUX   PALMES  "       .         .         .         .  xl 

NEW   ZEALAND,   NEAR   BANKS    PENINSULA,   CHAR- 
BONNIERS     POINT,     AKAROA.     ''PECHE     A     LA 

SEINE,"  1845 xn 

PR£-V0LANT   DES   ILES   MULGRAVES,  OCEANIE         .  xlii 

FRONTISPIECE    FOR    A    CATALOGUE,   BY   ARNAUL- 
DET,  OF    THE    WORKS    OF    THOMAS   DE  LEU, 

THE  ENGRAVER xliii 

RUE    PIROUETTE,  AUX   HALLES xliv 

PASSERELLE  DU  PONT-AU-CHANGE  APRfiS  L'lNCEN- 

DIE   DE    162 1  . XLV 

PARTIE   DE  LA   CITE   DE   PARIS,    VERS  LA   FIN    DU 

XVIP^^  SIECLE xLvi 

LE   GRAND  CHAtELET,  PARIS xlvii 

VUE  DE  L'ANCIEN  LOUVRE  DU  COTE  DE  LA  SEINE, 

165I XLVIII 

Where  M^ryon  gave  titles  to  his  etchings  they  are  catalogued  in  French.  In  all 
other  cases  where  there  is  no  generally  accepted  French  version  the  titles  are  given  in 
English. 

6 


CHARLES  MERYON 
BY  HUGH  STOKES 


OR  two  hundred  years  etching  remained  the  Cinderella 
of  the  arts.  Rembrandt  laid  aside  his  needle  in 
1 66 1,  and  from  that  date,  until  the  commencement 
of  the  publication  of  Meryon's  Eaux-fortes  sur  Paris 
in  1 85 1,  hardly  an  original  etching  of  any  import- 
ance was  issued  to  the  world. 
An  adequate  reason  is  difficult  to  find.  From  an  early  period 
the  great  masters  delighted  to  practise  this  exquisite  method  ot 
illustration.  But  they  viewed  it  chiefly  as  a  recreation,  and  allowed 
lesser  men  to  develop  the  art  to  its  fullest  extent.  Claude  did  not 
touch  more  than  thirty  plates,  although  one  of  these  plates  has  been 
called  "  the  finest  landscape  etching  in  the  world."  Van  Dyck's 
energy  in  this  field  was  a  mere  casual  diversion  from  the  more 
pressing  engagements  of  his  short  and  crowded  career.  Clever 
craftsmen,  like  Callot  and  Hollar,  manufactured  plates  by  the 
thousand,  using  burin  and  needle  indiscriminately.  With  many  ot 
the  Little  Masters,  who  flourished  in  the  Low  Countries,  pure 
etching  formed  a  serious  portion  of  their  output.  Sons  of  the 
people,  they  endeavoured  to  scatter  their  works  amongst  a  com- 
munity which  could  not  afl^ord  large  canvases,  and  thus  produced 
examples  of  their  talent  of  not  less  artistic  value.  To  mention  every 
Dutch  etcher  who  rose  above  mediocrity  would  be  to  enumerate  a 
list  of  names  of  considerable  length.  The  group  comprises  such  fine 
painters  as  Van  Ostade,  Ruysdael,  Paul  Potter,  Berghem,  Adrian 
Brouwer,  and  Jan  Both.  Then  there  were  minor  artists,  some  or 
whom,  such  as  Karel  du  Jardin,  Marc  de  Bye,  and  Renier  Zeeman, 
were  to  influence  so  strongly  the  genius  of  a  Frenchman  two 
centuries  later.  Rembrandt  overshadowed  them  all.  First  amongst 
painters,  he  was  at  the  same  time  the  greatest  of  etchers. 

Rembrandt  left  behind   some   three  hundred   and  fifty  prints  to 

delight  the  eyes,and  excite  the  cupidity,  of  every  succeeding  generation 

of  connoisseurs.     Unlike  other  great  painters,  these  etchings  form 

an  integral  part  of  his  artistic  life.     He  etched  successfully  almost 

from  the  beginning,  and  this  success  was  owing  to  the  force  of  his 

A  7 


CHARLES  MERYON 

mighty  personality.  For  etching  is  an  intensely  personal  art.  The 
gift  is  a  natural  one,  and  cannot  be  acquired  by  perseverance  or 
study.  For  instance,  Rembrandt  etched  fine  plates  whilst  he  was 
still  a  boy.  Modern  instances  give  additional  confirmation.  Whistler 
etched  some  of  his  best  work  before  he  was  thirty.  Sir  F.  Seymour 
Haden,  as  a  busy  surgeon,  could  not,  in  the  nature  of  things,  have 
ever  received  abundant  tuition.  Another  English  etcher,  who 
produces  plates  of  most  distinguished  quality,  bears  rank  as  an  army 
officer.  Jacquemart,  who  has  transferred  to  paper  the  sheen  and 
colour  of  the  most  precious  treasures  in  the  Louvre  in  a  manner  no 
man  can  dare  to  equal,  seems  to  have  become  an  etcher  without 
premeditation.  Meryon,  the  subject  of  this  sketch,  was  not  six 
months  in  an  engraver's  workroom.  These  are  the  men  who  have 
triumphed  with  the  needle,  and  one  would  almost  say  that  etching 
is  an  amateur's  method.  Yet  there  can  be  no  greater  mistake.  Not 
only  is  etching  a  very  morass  for  the  amateur  to  stick  in,  but  the 
paths  can  rarely  be  discovered,  even  by  the  cleverest  of  draughtsmen. 
Etchers,  like  poets,  are  born,  and  not  made.  The  truth  can  be 
demonstrated,  over  and  over  again,  in  any  portfolio  of  prints. 

Rembrandt  died  in  1669,  and  gradually,  as  the  other  Dutchmen 
followed  their  great  master,  etching  became  neglected.  Perhaps  the 
art  was  too  spontaneous  in  an  age  which  daily  grew  more  formal. 
Line  engraving  flourished  vigorously,  first  in  France,  and  afterwards 
in  England.  The  two  governments  deemed  it  wise  to  support  a 
craft  which  actually  reached  the  importance  of  a  commerce.  Indeed 
this  form  of  art  became  an  industry.  Whilst  Madame  de  Pompadour 
etched  little  plates  at  Versailles,  Louis  XV.  took  an  active  interest  in 
the  progress  of  his  royal  school  of  engraving  at  Gobelins.  Meta- 
phorically these  two  facts  illustrate  the  relative  positions  of  the 
needle  and  the  burin.  Artistic  courtiers  used  to  etch  little  plates  of 
those  anecdotes  which  they  could  scarcely  relate  in  words.  One 
cannot  say  much  for  the  propriety,  or  lack  of  it,  in  the  French  line 
engravings  of  that  age.     But  etching  was  hardly  so  respectable. 

Later  in  the  century  George  III.  encouraged  English  engraving 
by  the  creation  of  bounties.  Most  wonderful  things  were  done  on 
the  copper.  One  must  admit  that  many  of  the  productions  of  this 
period  are  specimens  of  misapplied  ingenuity  rather  than  objects 
of  art.  The  busy  engravers  issued  miracles  of  workmanship,  and 
the  great  artists  of  the  eighteenth  century  were  content  to  see  their 
paintings  reproduced  in  line,  or  in  stipple,  by  the  hand  of  some 
dexterous  craftsman.  Sometimes  etching  was  used  to  reinforce  other 
methods.  Chodowiecki  etched  and  engraved  on  the  same  plate,  so 
8 


CHARLES   MERYON 

did  Wollett.  But  the  great  etcher  (and  Piranesi  can  hardly  be 
included  under  this  title)  had  yet  to  come  forward  ;  the  true  artist, 
who,  with  the  needle,  would  draw  on  the  copper  his  original 
impressions,  instead  of  laboriously  translating,  from  the  painted 
canvas,  some  other  man's  ideas. 

The  ultimate  triumph  of  the  Romantic  School  in  France  may 
have  been  one  factor  which  influenced  the  revival  of  etching  during 
the  second  quarter  of  the  last  century.  With  the  defeat  of  the 
Classicalists  in  sight  all  young  artists  were  on  the  alert  for  new  or 
disregarded  technical  processes.  It  is  difficult  to  imagine  any  master 
of  the  Classical  School  practising  etching.  Flaxman's  beautiful  line 
was  essentially  one  for  an  engraver  and  not  for  an  etcher.  The 
invention  of  lithography  intervened,  and  possibly  delayed  and 
weakened  the  revival.  Lithography,  however,  lacks  that  distinction 
which  is  the  prerogative  of  good  etching.  The  best  lithograph  can 
never  be  other  than  a  simple  honest  bourgeois  in  the  world  of  art,  it 
cannot  sparkle.  A  fine  etching  is  an  aristocrat  of  the  first  water. 
Lithography  told  the  story  of  Napoleon's  peasant  army,  or  the  deeds 
of  Louis  Philippe's  National  Guard,  to  the  best  of  its  ability.  A 
reaction  was  bound  to  follow,  and,  since  that  day,  we  have  seen  the 
decadence,  and  also  the  revival,  of  the  lithograph. 

Etching  has  never  been  popular  with  the  vast  public  which  visits 
galleries  and  buys  pictures.  This  Charles  Meryon  found  to  his  cost, 
and  his  history  is  not  inspiriting.  As  a  painter  he  was  a  failure.  As 
an  etcher  he  was  unnoticed,  save  by  the  few  persons  who  knew  him 
personally.  His  existence  was  one  of  those  lives  of  prolonged  misery 
and  unhappiness  which  occur  so  often  in  art  biography.  It  must 
not  be  thought  that  these  men  are  always  in  the  depths.  There  are 
times  when  the  soul  of  the  artist,  conscious  of  great  achievement, 
of  ideals  successfully  reached,  rises  towards  its  Creator  in  a  glorious 
ecstasy,  which  no  mere  layman  can  ever  experience  or  appreciate. 
Meryon  deprecated  the  value  of  his  own  work.  Yet  there  must 
have  been  moments,  when,  gazing  at  his  Abside  de  Noire  Dame,  or 
La  Galerie  de  Notre  Dame,  he  knew  that  his  genius  had  given  im- 
perishable treasures  to  the  world. 

II 

Charles  Meryon  was  born  in  Paris,  on  November  23,  1821* 
For  most  of  the  facts  of  his  life  we  are  indebted  to  Monsieur  Philippe 
Burty's  notes,  originally  published  in  the  Gazette  des  Beaux-Arts 
in    1864.     These  notes  were  amplified,  and  an  English  translation 

9 


CHARLES  MERYON 

appeared  in  1879.  The  edition,  which  was  limited,  has  long  since 
gone  out  of  print.  Nearly  forty  years  have  passed  since  Meryon 
died,  and  there  remain  but  few  who  knew  him  personally.  Even 
they  could  add  little  to  our  knowledge,  for  Meryon  was  a  reticent 
and  solitary  man.  Burty's  biography,  and  a  few  scattered  French 
essays  of  no  deep  importance,  form  the  scanty  material  upon  which 
to  base  our  investigations. 

The  origin  of  a  genius  is  always  an  interesting  study.  The 
family  tree  of  Meryon  provokes  curiosity,  for  his  parentage  is  not  a 
matter  of  certainty.  His  mother  was  a  dancer  at  the  Opera  House. 
Her  son  always  said  that  she  was  of  Spanish  origin,  but  her  name 
belongs  to  France.  It  is  generally  supposed  that  the  artist's  father 
was  Charles  Lewis  Meryon,  an  English  physician  who  accompanied 
the  eccentric  Lady  Hester  Stanhope  upon  her  travels  in  the  Orient. 
He  was  the  son  of  Lewis  Meryon,  of  Rye  in  Sussex.  The  Meryons 
were  an  old  French  family,  originally  of  Huguenot  extraction.  To 
the  end  of  his  life  the  etcher  belonged  to  the  reformed  faith. 
Dr.  Charles  Lewis  Meryon  was  a  man  of  some  celebrity,  and  of 
superior  ability  and  culture.  Born  in  1783,  he  graduated  at  Oxford, 
studied  at  St.  Thomas'  Hospital,  and  was  elected  a  Fellow  of  the 
College  of  Physicians  in  the  year  of  the  etcher's  birth.  He  travelled 
with,  and  visited.  Lady  Hester  Stanhope  in  18 10,  1819,  1827  and 
1837.  The  two  volumes  he  published,  concerning  that  extraordinary 
household  at  the  foot  of  Mount  Lebanon,  are  from  the  pen  of  a 
clever  and  keen  observer.  One  would  like  to  know  more  of  this 
physician.     Dr.  Meryon  died  in  London  in  1877. 

All  the  biographers  of  Meryon  accept  the  paternity  of  the  English 
doctor.  When  Charles  decided  to  become  a  sailor,  Burty  writes  that 
the  boy  "  learnt  from  the  certificate  produced  upon  admission  that 
his  name  had  not  been  legitimised  by  his  father  until  three  years 
after  his  birth.  This  produced  a  violent  shock,  which  cast  over  his 
life  an  ineffaceable  tinge  of  melancholy  and  timidity."  These  are 
quoted  as  the  actual  words  of  Meryon,  and  would  appear  to  set  the 
matter  at  rest.  But,  on  May  29,  1865,  he  wrote  the  following 
letter  to  Monsieur  Leon  Delaunay,  which  is  quoted  at  length  in  a 
little  monograph  by  Aglaus  Bouvenne,  published  at  Paris  in  1883. 
"They  took  the  pretext  that  my  name  did  not  belong  to  me," 
Meryon  writes,  "  although  my  acte  de  naissatice  grants  it  to  me.  I 
must  tell  you  that  in  this  school  of  which  I  have  spoken  (Pension 
Savary,  to-day  Institution  Aubert  Savary)  I  was  known  under  the 
name  of  Gentil,  having  only  assumed  that  of  Meryon  when  I  began 
my  career  in  the  navy.  This  name  is  that  of  a  family  residing  in 
10 


CHARLES  MERYON 

England,  and  of  one  of  its  oldest  representatives,  Monsieur  C.  L. 
Meryon,  whom  I  long  believed  to  be  my  father,  although  he  was 
only,  I  think,  my  guardian.  The  substance  of  my  acte  de  nahsance 
authorises  me  to  carry  this  name,  and  lately,  on  my  proposition  to 
give  it  up,  lest  it  should  bring  annoyance  to  him,  and  prejudice  to 
me.  Monsieur  C.  L.  Meryon  personally  confirmed  his  former 
consent."  This  assertion  does  not  agree  with  the  statements  made 
by  Monsieur  Burty,  or  any  other  biographer,  and  is  practically, 
although  not  directly,  contradicted  by  another  peculiar  document. 

In  the  collection  belonging  to  Monsieur  Burty  was  a  large 
manuscript  book  in  which  Meryon  copied  many  of  the  letters  he 
wrote  to  various  people.  For  safe  keeping,  he  placed  between  the 
leaves  some  of  the  letters  he  received.  This  interesting  volume  has 
now  crossed  the  Atlantic,  and  was  exhibited  by  the  New  York 
Grolier  Club  several  years  ago.  The  short  preface  to  the  Club*s 
catalogue  of  the  etchings  contains  the  following  letter,  which  throws 
a  new  light  upon  the  artist's  intercourse  with  his  English  connections. 
Under  the  date  of  January  7,  1866,  Dr.  Meryon  writes  : 

"  My  Dear  Friend, — You  leave  me  without  news  of  yourself  for  so  long  that  I 
fear  you  are  ill.-    Your  sister  also  does  not  write  to  me. 

"  Since  my  last  letter  I  have  had  misfortunes  of  which  the  death  of  my  dear  wife 
was  the  saddest.  The  others  relate  only  to  money  matters,  which  are  mended  by 
economy,  but  the  first  has  prostrated  me  so  that  I  have  not  before  this  had  the  heart  to 
write  to  you. 

"  At  the  beginning  of  the  new  year  I  find  myself  free  from  debt,  and  I  am  preparing 
to  send  you  two  hundred  francs,  if  you  will  accept  them.  For  you  will  doubtless 
remember  that  the  last  time  I  sent  you  a  small  sum  you  accounted  it  as  io  much  taken 
from  the  enemy. 

"  Eugenie  does  not  forget  you  by  any  means. 

"  We  intend,  circumstances  permitting,  to  pay  you  a  visit  next  spring. 

"Jean  has  married  a  young  French  girl  of  Smyrna,  and  is  stopping  in  that  city  at 
present. 

"  The  photograph  of  yourself,  so  well  taken,  and  which  you  presented  to  me  some 
years  ago,  hangs  on  the  wall  over  the  fireplace  in  my  bedroom.  There  I  study  your 
features  every  morning  on  rising,  every  evening  when  retiring.  You  much  resemble 
your  dear  mother. 

"  As  to  Fanny,  I  wrote  to  her  several  months  ago,  asking  for  her  photograph,  but 
she  would  not  grant  me  that  favour,  saying  that  she  did  not  have  any  printed. 

"  Eugenie  has  changed  but  little  ;  but  time  has  left  heavy  marks  on  me,  and  I 
exist  at  present  only  by  sufferance  and  the  goodwill  of  God.     Always  your  friend, 

«  C.  L  M." 

A  concluding  paragraph  asks  that  letters  should  be  sent  to  his  bankers 
in  Lombard  Street  "  as  formerly." 

This  letter  is  one  of  friendship  and  affection,  which  the  artist 
did  not  reciprocate.  Meryon  copied  his  reply  into  his  commonplace 
book.     It  is  dated  February  8,  1866,  and  states  that  he  had  not 

II 


CHARLES  MERYON 

heard  from  his  father  since  1863,  excepting  through  the  visit  of  a 
Monsieur  Miranda,  made  in  the  elder  Meryon's  name.  He  then 
writes  : 

"  I  certainly  feel  a  real  pleasure  in  knowing  that  you  are  enjoying  as  good  health 
as  is  possible  considering  on  the  one  hand  your  advancing  age,  and  on  the  other  the 
misfortunes  which  have  befallen  you,  and  of  which  indeed  the  most  painful  is  the  death 
of  Madame  M<^ryon,  a  loss  which  I,  too,  who  have  retained  so  pleasant  a  recollection  or 
her  character,  feel  with  sincere  and  profound  regret  ;  for  I  have  not  forgotten,  as  I  have 
often  said  to  you,  the  happy  time,  free  from  all  care,  the  sweetest  of  my  childhood, 
which  I  passed  in  your  company  and  that  of  that  good  and  amiable  lady.  ,  .  ,'* 

Where  did  Meryon  spend  this  "  happy  time "  ?  Was  it  in 
England  ?  Monsieur  Burty  makes  no  reference  to  it.  The  letter 
continues  :  "  But,  Monsieur  Meryon,  despite  this  knowledge  that  it 
is  pleasant  to  me  to  address  you,  notwithstanding  the  respect  which 
has  always  been  inspired  in  me  by  that  organising  force  given  to  you 
by  the  Creator,  to  whom,  as  I  see  with  pleasure,  you  render  homage," 
— and  rambles  into  a  number  of  aimless  complaints.  Apologising  for 
his  frankness,  even  brutality,  he  states  that  the  sum  sent  by  Dr.  Meryon 
is  a  trap,  a  means  of  hastening  his  death,  and  that  he  cannot  accept 
it.  He  does  not  put  faith  in  the  statement  regarding  Jean,  but 
believes  that  he  is  dead.  He  does  not  count  on  the  proposed  visit, 
which  he  thinks  would  be  unprofitable  and  useless,  and,  as  for 
Eugenie,  she  is  his  pitiless  enemy.  The  letter  becomes  tragically 
incoherent. 

There  docs  not  seem  to  be  much  doubt  as  to  Meryon's  descent, 
although  he  himself  is  dubious.  The  fact  is  of  some  importance, 
for  it  means  that  this  great  artist  was  of  an  English  stock,  which, 
generations  previously,  had  fled  from  France.  A  more  curious  inter- 
national "  give  and  take  "  cannot  be  found  in  biography.  We  do  not 
know  from  what  ancestor  Meryon  inherited  his  artistic  instincts,  but 
he  was  not  the  first  poetaster  of  his  name.  About  18 10,  Mr.  Lewis 
Meryon,  of  Rye,  published  an  unambitious  versified  description  or 
the  contents  of  a  stationer's  shop.  Forty  years  later  Monsieur 
Charles  Meryon,  of  Paris,  was  scratching  the  most  extraordinary 
rhymes  on  the  edges  of  his  coppers. 

The  early  life  of  Meryon  could  not  have  been  one  of  unalloyed 
happiness.  Money  was  probably  not  wanting.  Dr.  Meryon  is  said 
to  have  supplied  the  mother  with  a  considerable  sum,  and,  according 
to  one  biographer,  there  were  other  admirers  within  call.  One 
may  reasonably  doubt  this  statement.  "  Intelligent  and  gentle, 
she  bestowed  upon  her  son  the  most  ardent  affection,  and 
watched  over  his  early  education  with  unceasing  care,"  wrote 
12 


CHARLES   MERYON 

Burty.  There  was  a  sister,  who  was  taken  away  to  England,  and 
who  made  a  most  brilliant  marriage,  which  effectually  cut  her 
existence  away  from  the  Bohemian  household  in  Paris.  The  letter 
in  the  commonplace  book  does  not  corroborate  this  story,  unless 
there  were  two  sisters.  Then  there  was  a  maternal  grandmother, 
"  a  most  offensive  creature "  says  Mr.  Frederick  Wedmore,  who 
draws  a  picture  of  much  moral  degradation,  which,  if  it  existed, 
Monsieur  Burty  ignores. 

The  child  was  extremely  nervous  and  excitable,  with  a  tendency 
towards  bad  health.  At  the  age  of  five  he  was  placed  in  a  school 
at  Passy,  where  he  does  not  seem  to  have  been  a  skilful  pupil.  One 
day  he  was  taken  to  the  theatre.  The  lights  were  turned  down. 
The  piece  may  have  been  Robert  le  Diable,  for  skeletons  gambolled 
across  the  stage.  Picking  up  spades  they  commenced  to  dig.  The 
boy  was  so  upset  at  this  danse  macabre  that  he  had  to  go  home. 
"  Mamma,"  said  he,  "  is  it  to  disgust  me  with  agriculture  that  the 
Government  sends  skeletons  on  to  the  stage  ?  "  Forty  years  later 
the  scene  haunted  his  fancy.  Upon  the  whole  he  seems  to  have 
been  as  happy  as  Barty  Josselin  was  at  the  Institution  F.  Brossard. 
He  told  Philippe  Burty  that  the  situation  of  the  schoolhouse  in  the 
open  fields,  the  playgrounds,  the  sports,  and  the  good  food,  all 
helped  to  build  up  his  health  and  strength.  He  acquired  a  little 
Latin,  and,  more  important  still,  he  had  elementary  drawing  lessons 
from  a  master  who  had  studied  under  a  landscape  painter. 

How  long  he  remained  at  Passy  is  not  clear.  Possibly  several 
years,  for  he  must  have  been  considerably  older  when  he  went  to 
Marseilles,  and  thence  journeyed  on  a  circular  tour  to  Hyeres,  Nice, 
Genoa,  Pisa,  and  Leghorn.  On  his  return  to  Paris  he  had  already 
decided  his  future.  The  shipping  at  Marseilles  influenced  his 
youthful  mind.  He  obtained  his  mother's  consent,  was  coached  by 
a  professor  of  mathematics,  and,  in  1837,  passed  into  the  Naval 
School  at  Brest. 

Meryon  suffered  all  his  life  from  a  nervous  sensitiveness  which 
was  probably  congenital.  His  melancholy  and  timidity  are  said  to 
have  dated  from  the  shock  he  received  at  this  stage  when  he  learnt, 
for  the  first  time,  the  true  facts  of  his  birth.  The  cause,  however, 
was  much  deeper.  He  was  hereditarily  predisposed  towards  that 
state  of  mental  collapse  which  ultimately  drove  him  to  Charenton. 
Morbidly  conscious  of  the  slightest  slur,  always  more  or  less 
suspicious,  even  of  his  friends,  yet  frank  and  gentle  in  his  manner, 
Charles  Meryon  enjoyed  his  happiest  days  as  a  naval  cadet.  He 
was  deeply  attached  to  his  profession,  and,  as  an  amateur,  he  dallied 


CHARLES  MfiRYON 

with  the  pencil  to  good  purpose.  In  1839  his  first  voyage  com- 
menced. He  sailed  in  the  Algiers,  which  left  Toulon  for  the  north 
coast  of  Africa  and  the  Levant.  At  Smyrna  he  was  transferred  to 
a  three-decker,  the  Montebello. 

The  voyage  was  rich  in  impressions.  The  youth  of  eighteen 
opened  his  sketch-book  to  advantage.  In  it  he  drew  the  Choragic 
monument  at  Athens,  then  part  of  the  entrance  to  the  convent  of 
the  French  Capucines.  Fifteen  years  later  this  page  formed  the 
basis  of  that  magnificent  etching  which  was  buried  in  Count 
Laborde*s  book  of  travel  and  archaeology.  The  frieze  of  the  Temple 
of  Theseus  was  outlined,  the  tomb  of  Agamemnon  and  the  solemn 
Lion  Gate  visited.  Here  Meryon  discovered  the  beauties  of  classical 
architecture.  He  studied  the  works  of  the  Greeks  amidst  their 
actual  surroundings.  He  was  never  bound  apprentice  to  an  office 
drawing-board,  or  chained  down  to  a  weary  repetition  of  the  Five 
Orders,  yet,  in  some  mysterious  manner,  he  developed  into  a 
marvellous  architectural  draughtsman. 

With  such  energy  his  art  must  have  rapidly  improved.  Upon 
his  return  to  Toulon  he  had  lessons  from  a  painter  in  pencil,  water- 
colour,  indian  ink,  and  sepia.  His  work,  writes  Burty,  was 
woolly,  but  the  actual  drawing  correct  and  delicate.  His  reputation 
as  an  amateur  spread.  Like  Clarkson  Stanfield,  he  painted  the  scenes 
for  the  dramatic  performances  upon  his  new  vessel,  the  Rhine.  This 
ship  made  a  prolonged  cruise  in  Australian  waters,  visiting  the  Banks 
Peninsula,  New  Zealand,  New  Caledonia,  and  the  South  Seas.  Years 
after,  during  the  course  of  his  grey  struggle  for  life  in  Paris,  Meryon 
referred  to  this  sunny  voyage  with  longing  and  regret. 

He  was  popular  with  his  fellow  officers.  His  disposition  was 
naturally  a  happy  and  gentle  one.  His  sketch-books  were  rapidly 
filled,  and  he  made  quaint  attempts  at  sculpture.  One  story 
illustrates  his  sensitiveness,  and  also  his  tenacity  of  purpose.  The 
scene  was  the  bay  of  Akaroa.  The  captain  of  the  Rhine  refused 
to  allow  his  officers  to  go  ashore  in  his  gig.  They  were  annoyed  at 
the  restriction,  and  at  the  indignity,  as  it  appeared  to  them,  of  being 
compelled  to  use  a  boat  common  to  the  whole  crew.  Meryon  asked 
for,  and  received,  permission  to  go  ashore.  He  settled  in  the  forest 
some  distance  from  the  sea,  and  got  the  ship's  carpenter  to  cut  down 
a  large  yew  with  a  girth  of  more  than  four  yards.  The  tree  was 
hard  in  grain,  and  of  an  enormous  size.  For  three  months  Meryon 
lived  on  shore  in  a  little  tent.  From  time  to  time  his  comrades  sent 
him  provisions.  At  night  he  was  compelled  to  light  a  fire  to 
frighten  the  wild  animals  which  surrounded  him.     Day  after  day, 


CHARLES  MERYON 

with  the  utmost  toil,  he  slaved  away  at  this  self-imposed  task,  wear- 
ing his  hands  literally  to  the  bone.  The  tree  became  a  boat,  five 
yards  long.  So  well  had  it  been  designed  that,  when  launched,  its 
sea-going  qualities  were  perfect.  Captain  Berard  was  moved  to 
tears.  The  boat  was  brought  back  to  France,  and  deposited  in  the 
Arsenal  at  Toulon.  The  tale  is  somewhat  incredible,  but  is  told  on 
unquestionable  authority. 

The  cruise  ended,  and  Meryon  came  back  to  France.  His 
mother  had  died  in  the  meanwhile.  He  took  six  months'  leave  and 
went  to  Paris.  Burty  remarks  that  he  considered  his  health  weak, 
although  the  fancy  had  no  foundation  in  fact.  The  author  of  the 
introduction  to  the  catalogue  of  the  Burlington  Fine  Arts  Club  says 
that  Meryon  was  induced  to  leave  the  navy  by  reason  of  his  birth. 
In  his  eyes,  sailors  were,  as  a  body,  the  noblest,  the  best  of  men. 
Those  who  commanded  them  ought  to  be  great,  not  only  in  stature, 
but  also  in  mind  and  morals — he  was  neither.  Their  officers 
ought  also  to  be  men  of  good  position  and  birth — he  was 
nobody's  son.  These  are  quoted  as  Meryon's  own  words.  Thus 
Meryon  appears  to  have  given  up  all  desires  for  a  seafaring  life,  and 
be  received  a  promise  from  the  Minister  of  the  Marine  that  a  post 
should  be  kept  vacant  for  him  in  the  Hydrographical  Department. 
His  mother  had  left  him  a  small  estate  of  some  twenty  thousand  francs, 
and  Meryon  delayed  obtaining  an  extension  of  his  leave.  Suddenly 
he  received  a  peremptory  notice  to  rejoin  his  ship.  His  sensitive 
spirit  revolted.  He  had  been  treated  unjustly.  Aggrieved  at  not 
receiving  the  promised  appointment,  he  at  once  gave  in  his  resigna- 
tion. One  authority  writes  that  he  was  in  a  state  of  destitution,  as 
his  pay  was  five  months  in  arrear.  It  is  hard  to  reconcile  this  story 
with  the  fact  of  his  mother's  legacy.  After  some  argument  his 
resignation  was  accepted,  and  he  received  his  discharge  on  September 
17,  1846. 

At  the  age  of  twenty-five,  without  capital,  and  with  the 
slenderest  technical  accomplishments,  Meryon  became  a  professional 
artist.  He  lived  in  the  Rue  Saint-Andre-des-Arts,  and  had  a  studio 
in  the  Rue  Hautefeuille.  Although  he  had  washed  his  hands  of  the 
Ministrv  of  the  Marine,  he  did  not  cut  all  connection  with  the 
Services,  for  he  had  lessons  of  a  painter  who  was  also  a  clerk  in  the 
War  Office.  Monsieur  Phelippes  was  an  old  pupil  of  David,  and,  as 
can  be  surmised,  took  himself  very  seriously.  Meryon  was  taught  to 
draw  in  charcoal  from  casts  of  the  Apollo  Belvedere  and  the  Olympian 
Jupiter.  He  also  studied  anatomy,  and  copied  in  the  Louvre.  His 
attitude  towards  the  old  masters  was  not  one  of  reverence.     He  gave 

B  15 


CHARLES   MERYON 

Burty  a  drawing  in  red  chalk,  "  which  he  had  copied  with  minute 
exactness  from  the  marvellous  drawing  by  Raphael  representing 
Psyche  holding  in  her  hands  a  vase  of  crystal."  "  In  my  copy  I  have 
been  obliged  to  correct  one  of  the  eyes,  which  is  not  in  its  proper 
place,"  said  the  young  artist. 

At  length  he  commenced  his  first  picture,  and  the  preliminary 
drawing  was  sent  to  the  Salon  in  1848.  Like  most  early  pictures  it 
was  of  large  size,  six  feet  in  length,  and  represented  a  grandiose  sub- 
ject. The  Assassination  of  Marion  Dufrene^  captain  of  a  fire-ship  at  the 
Bay  oj  the  Isles^  New  Zealand,  the  1 3M  August  1772,  was  not  a  success. 
It  was  morbidly  gruesome.  Amidst  a  group  of  natives  kneels  the 
captain.  An  executioner  raises  a  club,  and  is  about  to  deliver  the 
fatal  blow.  The  whole  composition  is  flat,  and  Meryon  did  not 
carry  it  to  completion.  His  next  essay  he  gave  up  in  despair.  Inspired 
by  the  Revolution  of  July,  which  had  taken  place  in  the  previous 
year,  it  was  purely  allegorical. 

As  a  painter  his  career  had  already  ended.  He  suffered  from 
Daltonism,  that  peculiar  disease  of  the  eyes  in  which  one  colour  is 
mistaken  for  another.  His  biographer  says  that  he  could  not 
distinguish  the  ripe  fruit  on  a  cherry-tree  from  its  leaves.  On  his 
palette  he  used  red  for  yellow,  and  pink  for  green,  whilst  some  other 
colours,  such  as  pure  carmine,  gold,  cobalt,  and  lapis  lazuli,  he  could 
distinguish  with  extreme  delicacy.  During  one  of  his  naval  voyages 
the  officers  were  shooting  sea-gulls  from  the  quarter-deck. 

"What  colour  do  you  make  out  their  breasts  to  be?"  asked 
Meryon. 

"  A  spotless  white,"  was  the  reply. 

"  You  are  wrong,"  said  Meryon,  "  the  colour  is  an  inimitable 
rose." 

*' That's  impossible.     However  we'll  soon  see." 

The  bird  was  shot,  and  its  breast  was  a  salmon-coloured  rose  of 
an  extraordinary  tint. 

It  is  interesting  to  learn  what  great  masters  had  most  impressed 
this  young  artist.  Eugene  Delacroix,  Decamps,  and  Hogarth 
compose  a  curious  trio.  As  to  Delacroix,  he  was  probably  fascinated 
by  the  sentiment,  if  it  is  not  sentimentalism,  which  distinguishes  all 
the  works  of  that  artist.  Himself  a  man  of  moods,  a  modern  Hamlet 
who  found  the  world  out  of  sorts,  Meryon  would  be  apt  to  see  his 
own  personality  enshrined  in  the  melodramatic  heroes  of  Delacroix. 
That  a  colour-blind  painter  should  admire  so  vigorous  a  colourist  as 
Decamps  is  difficult  to  explain.  Hogarth's  art  he  had  studied  during 
a  short  visit  to  England,  made  about  1847.  Possibly  Hogarth 
16 


CHARLES   MERYON 

aroused  that  dormant  feeling  for  the  past  which,  later  on,  so  influenced 
his  etchings.     Still,  the  choice  was  an  odd  one. 

Meryon  now  studied  in  the  atelier  of  Monsieur  E.  Blery,  the 
engraver. 

At  Blery 's  he  worked  very  hard.  Burty  follows  the  history  of 
his  development  closely.  He  copied  portraits,  a  miniature  of  Christ 
after  Philippe  de  Champaigne,  and  engravings  after  De  Loutherbourg, 
Salvator  Rosa,  and  Karel  du  Jardin.  But  one  master,  in  his  bio- 
grapher's own  words,  carried  him  away,  and  made  him  an  etcher. 
Meryon  bought  for  a  few  pence  some  views  of  Paris,  done  about 
1650  by  Renier  Zeeman.  "He  was  struck  by  the  dexterous  clear- 
ness of  the  lines  made  with  the  needle,  with  the  quietness  of  the 
tone,  and  the  brilliancy  of  the  biting."  These  must  have  been 
Meryon's  own  words.  He  caught  the  style  of  Zeeman  exactly,  and 
it  characterises  the  whole  of  the  early  portion  of  his  work. 

Meryon  remained  six  months  with  Monsieur  Blery.  His  mental 
powers,  we  are  told,  were  already  weakening.  He  fell  in  love  with 
the  daughter  of  the  proprietor  of  the  restaurant  where  he  had  his 
food.  If  such  actions  are  to  be  accepted  as  convincing  proofs  of 
insanity,  the  number  of  the  feeble-minded  must  be  appalling.  The 
girl  who  had  fascinated  the  unhappy  man,  in  his  own  words,  "  above 
all  things  on  account  of  her  charming  voice,"  looked  another  way, 
and  Meryon  continued  his  bachelorhood  until  his  death. 

Up  to  this  period  Meryon's  work  had  been  simply  one  of 
preparation.  During  the  two  years  1 849-1 850  he  had  copied  plates 
after  De  Loutherbourg,  Nicolle,  and  Zeeman,  and  it  cannot  be  said 
that  the  result  was  of  great  value.  But  the  master  who  had  inspired 
his  style  also  directed  him  towards  a  choice  of  subject.  In  copying 
Zeeman's  Pavilion  of  Mademoiselle^  and  a  Fart  of  the  Louvre,  he 
conceived  the  idea  of  a  series  of  etchings  devoted  to  the  city  he 
loved  so  well.  Between  1851  and  1854  appeared  the  Eaux-fortes  sur 
Paris,  upon  which  his  fame  rests.  Unknown  and  unappreciated 
during  his  lifetime,  these  twenty  plates,  of  varying  merit  and 
importance,  placed  him  amongst  the  masters  of  his  craft.  "Meryon," 
wrote  Sir  Seymour  Haden,  "  though  neither  an  etcher  or  an  engraver 
pur  et  simple,  was  undoubtedly  one  of  the  greatest  artists  on  copper 
that  the  world  has  produced." 

His  methods  were  curious.  He  rarely  completed  his  sketch 
upon  the  spot.  Having  decided  upon  his  point  of  view,  he  would 
sketch  day  after  day  at  the  same  time.  These  sketches  consisted  of 
studies  of  detail,  which  he  endeavoured  to  make  exceedingly  exact. 
When  he  arrived  home  he  would    stick  all    these   little    sketches 

17 


CHARLES  MERYON 

together,  and  make  a  completed  drawing  from  them.  He  worked 
with  a  very  hard  pencil,  which  he  used  as  if  it  were  a  graver.  When 
drawing,  he  commenced  at  the  bottom  and  worked  upwards.  He 
told  his  friends  that  buildings  were  always  raised  from  the  foundations, 
and  he  desired  to  do  likewise.  Although  afflicted  with  Daltonism, 
his  keen  sight  was  remarkable,  and  this  explains  the  minute  detail  in 
many  of  his  etchings.  He  could  distinguish  the  finest  architectural 
details,  says  Monsieur  Burty,  as  well  as  if  he  had  used  a  telescope. 

Whilst  the  Paris  set  was  in  progress,  Meryon  lived  in  some  rooms 
in  the  Rue  Saint-Etienne-du-Mont.  His  means  were  of  the  smallest. 
His  livelihood  was  hardly  more  secure  than  that  of  the  wretched 
creatures  he  vaguely  outlined  on  his  plates.  There  was  no  demand 
for  his  etchings,  which  he  carried  from  dealer  to  dealer  with  scant 
result.  For  the  fifteen  etchings  of  the  Paris  set,  eleven  large  and 
four  small,  he  asked  the  modest  sum  of  thirty  francs.  For  a  single 
etching  he  would  sometimes  accept  a  franc.  In  every  way  he  was 
a  typical  example  of  the  unsuccessful  artist.  In  1853  the  Salon 
rejected  the  Galerie  de  Notre  Dame,  and  the  Rue  des  Toiles,  although 
he  exhibited  upon  six  other  occasions.  He  had  few  friends,  and  did 
not  encourage  additions  to  the  circle,  for  he  was  suspicious  of  the 
whole  world.  An  old  naval  chum,  the  Commandant  de  Salicis, 
visited  him,  and  the  two  engravers,  Flameng  and  Bracquemond,  were 
staunch  supporters.  Baudelaire  admired  his  work  exceedingly,  and 
Theophile  Gautier,  surely  one  of  the  most  eclectic  and  discerning  ot 
all  art  critics,  attempted  to  introduce  his  etchings  to  the  general 
public. 

It  may  be  well  understood  that  such  work  was  bound  to  excite 
the  enthusiasm  of  the  author  of  "  Notre  Dame  de  Paris,"  who  was 
himself,  although  untrained,  an  artist  of  no  mean  order.  "  These 
etchings  are  magnificent  things,"  wrote  Victor  Hugo  from  Guernsey. 
"  We  must  not  allow  this  splendid  imagination  to  be  worsted  in  the 
struggle  in  which  it  is  engaged  with  the  Infinite,  whilst  studying 
Nature  or  Paris.  Strengthen  him  by  all  the  encouragements  possible. 
The  breath  of  the  universe  is  throughout  his  work,  and  makes  his 
etchings  more  than  pictures.  They  are  visions."  This  utterance  is 
grandiloquently  Hugoesque,  and  does  not  appear  to  have  been  of  any 
material  assistance  to  the  unhappy  Meryon. 

His  condition  became  more  and  more  deplorable.  When  he  went 
to  deposit  some  proofs  at  the  office  of  the  Minister  of  the  Interior, 
he  is  said  to  have  been  starving.  There  he  found  a  new  supporter. 
Monsieur  Jules  Niel,  immediately  noting  his  obvious  genius,  en- 
deavoured to  obtain  commissions  for  him.  The  Due  d'Arenberg 
18 


CHARLES  M^RYON 

had  seen,  and  appreciated,  the  Paris  set.  In  1857  Meryon  was 
invited  to  visit  Enghien,  and  etch  views  of  the  chateau  and  its 
grounds.  A  photographic  camera  was  provided,  and  he  took  lessons 
in  the  new  art  at  Brussels.  He  settled  in  the  village  of  Enghien, 
and  prepared  to  work.  But  his  mental  distress  was  rapidly  develop- 
ing, and,  in  March  1858,  he  returned  to  Paris  in  a  condition  border- 
ing on  delirium. 

He  was  suspicious  of  the  intentions  of  his  best  friends.  Bracquc- 
mond  called  one  day  at  his  rooms,  and  found  the  master  away.  As 
an  artistic  joke,  instead  of  writing  a  few  lines  of  explanation,  he 
drew  upon  the  bare  wall  a  fantastic  sketch  of  a  bird  perched  upon  a 
bough,  in  the  act  of  snapping  up  an  unconscious  fly.  The  drawing 
has  been  preserved.  It  has  the  dainty  grace  of  a  Japanese  draughts- 
man. When  Meryon  returned  and  saw  it,  he  was  thrown  into  an 
intense  agitation.  Nothing  could  calm  him.  The  drawing  was  a 
mystical  foreboding  of  his  future.  "  If  you  care  to  know,"  he  cried, 
"  read  on  that  wall  my  fate.  I  can  no  more  avoid  what  is  coming 
on  me  than  that  fly  can  avoid  the  bird." 

Daily  he  became  more  unsociable.  During  this  period  of  gloom 
he  etched  the  weird  Rue  des  Mauvais  Garpns^  with  an  enigmatic 
couplet  scratched  at  its  head  :  "  What  mortal  lived  in  this  sombre 
dwelling  ?  Who  hid  in  the  shadow  and  the  night  ?  Was  it  Virtue, 
poor  and  silent,  or  was  it  Crime,  a  vicious  soul  ?  I  am  ignorant. 
If  you,  curious  being,  wish  to  know,  go  and  see.  There  is  yet 
time."  It  cannot  be  said  that  these  lines  explain  the  mystery  of  the 
Rue  des  Mauvais  Garpns.  This  etching  was  a  favourite  with  the 
poet  Baudelaire,  to  whom,  in  i860,  Meryon  wrote,  enclosing  "  un 
cahier  des  mes  vues  de  Paris." 

He  now  lived  in  a  little  summer-house  in  the  Faubourg  Saint- 
Jacques,  which  belonged  to  the  mother  of  Leon  Gaucherel,  the 
engraver.  He  worked  intermittently.  When  he  returned  from 
Belgium,  he  dug  up  the  garden  to  find  the  dead  bodies  he  believed 
to  be  interred  in  it.  Then  he  kept  his  bed,  and,  whenever  any  one 
entered,  excitedly  flourished  a  pistol.  Such  a  condition  of  things 
could  not  continue  long  unchecked.  On  May  12,  1858,  he  was 
removed  to  the  asylum  at  Charenton.  The  new  inmate  was  oflici- 
ally  reported  as  suffering  from  "  melancholy  madness,  complicated 
by  delusions." 

For  fifteen  months  he  remained  at  Charenton,  and,  although 
he  was  discharged  as  cured,  he  was  never  far  from  madness.  His 
etchings  became  slightly  more  popular,  and  good  friends  were  always 
ready  to  care  for  him.     Even  in  the  asylum,  during  his  first  deten- 

19 


CHARLES   MERYON 

tion,  he  was  described  as  being  gentle  and  polite.    When  he  laughed 
it  was  with  the  laughter  of  a  child. 

In  a  letter  written  many  years  after.  Doctor  Gachet,  who  knew 
Meryon  well,  gave  an  interesting  picture  of  the  etcher,  which  has 
not  been  reproduced  for  the  benefit  of  English  readers.  "  Meryon,'* 
wrote  the  doctor,  "  was  of  short  stature,  of  rather  a  bilious  and 
nervous  temperament,  and  physically  dry  and  shrunken.  He  was 
simple  in  his  dress,  easily  took  offence,  and  was  guarded  in  his  looks. 
He  avoided  pleasure  and  comrades.  He  loved  solitude  and  work. 
By  nature  unhealthy  and  dull,  he  was  temperate,  ate  little,  and  drank 
still  less.  He  was  always  uneasy,  and  seemed  the  prey  to  a  disturb- 
ing suggestion  of  some  kind.  You  might  have  said  that  his  thoughts 
wandered  away  from  his  body,  for  at  times  he  appeared  to  be  far 
away  from,  and  unconscious  of,  the  society  in  which  he  happened 
to  be.  In  fact,  he  did  not  love  society.  He  dined  at  my  house 
more  than  once,  but  always  with  the  greatest  circumspection,  and 
after  much  hesitation.  The  painter  A.  Gautier  had  some  influence 
over  him  and  seemed  to  please  him.  They  came  together  to  my 
house.  It  was  only  with  the  greatest  difficulty  that,  with  the  help 
of  Gautier,  I  was  able  to  obtain  the  Eaux-fortes  sur  Paris,  and  then 
only  two  at  a  time. 

"  Meryon  appeared  always  a  prey  to  the  idea  which  obsessed 
him.  He  promised  to  let  us  know  the  cause  of  his  sadness,  and  it 
was  no  doubt  the  starting-point  of  his  mental  disease.  It  was  the 
origin  of  it.  He  found  himself  unhappy,  and  believed  that  he  was 
alone  on  earth,  surrounded  by  people  with  bad  intentions. 

"  His  nature  was  sensitive,  straightforward,  and  delicate,  but  his 
brains  were  ill-balanced. 

"  Art,  for  him,  was  but  a  fetish,  an  ideal  one  was  not  to  touch. 
There  were  no  artists  ;  art  was  too  difficult.  He  himself  was  of  no 
account.  You  could  not  tell  him  that  his  work  was  good,  or  that 
he  had  talent,  it  was  not  possible  to  praise  him  in  his  presence.  To 
do  so  was  to  make  yourself  his  enemy. 

"  One  might  aspire  towards  art,  and  desire  it.     But  that  was  all ! 

"  For  some  things  he  had  a  horror.  Water,  for  instance.  He 
could  not  think  of  it,  and  made  no  secret  of  his  aversion.  One 
day  I  asked  him  whether  he  had  ever  painted  marine  subjects  or  sea- 
ports. He  replied  that  one  should  not  reproduce  water.  That  the 
sight  and  vicinity  of  water  was  sinister  and  dangerous.  These 
notions  were  deeply  rooted  in  him.  As  soon  as  he  spoke  of  water 
his  face  assumed  a  sad  and  lugubrious  air." 

At  his  best,  Meryon's  company  must  have  been  very  fascinating. 
20 


CHARLES   MERYON 

Monsieur  Burty  reports  a  conversation  which  shows  that  this  serious 
man  had  his  happy  moments.  "  At  certain  dates,"  he  told  Burty, 
"  every  work  of  art  that  is  not  without  a  doubt  worthy  of  preserva- 
tion should  be  destroyed.  Of  the  sculpture,  mortar  should  be  made 
by  means  of  an  enormous  crusher.  Of  paintings  they  should  make 
tarpaulins,  such  as  sailors  cover  packages  with  on  board  ship.  The 
artists  would  be  the  first  to  lend  themselves  to  such  a  scheme,  for  if 
they  had,  for  instance,  made  a  second-rate  statue  for  the  decoration 
of  a  monument,  they  would  be  enchanted  to  see  it  replaced  by  a 
better.  The  whole  world  would  be  the  gainers  by  it,  from  the 
models  who  pose  for  the  statues,  or  the  custodians  who  watch  over 
them  in  the  museums,  to  the  hewers  of  stone  and  the  draymen  who 
transport  it  to  the  studio."  There  is  a  rich  vein  of  sarcasm  in  these 
remarks,  which,  after  all,  are  not  so  very  mad. 

Meryon,  however,  was  extremely  disconcerting  to  chance  visitors. 
In  one  of  his  books.  Sir.  F.  Seymour  Haden  relates  how  he  called 
upon  the  artist  in  Montmartre.  The  room,  high  up  the  celebrated 
hill,  was  exceedingly  clean  and  tidy.  It  contained  a  bed,  a  chair  and 
a  table,  together  with  a  printing  press  for  proofs,  and  an  easel.  Upon 
the  easel  was  a  plate,  before  which  Meryon  stood  and  worked.  He 
was  amiable  to  his  visitor,  and  immediately  commenced  to  talk  about 
the  resources  and  charms  of  his  craft.  Mr.  Haden,  as  he  then  was, 
left  with  some  impressions  of  Meryon's  etchings  under  his  arm. 
"While  his  back  was  turned,"  writes  the  surgeon,  "I  was  scrupulous 
to  leave  on  the  table  what  I  felt  sure  was  more  than  the  dealers 
would  then  have  given  for  them.     We  parted  the  best  of  friends." 

The  surgeon  had  walked  fully  two  miles  in  the  direction  of  Paris, 
and  was  already  in  the  Rue  de  Richelieu,  when  he  found  that 
Meryon  was  following  him.  The  artist  was  greatly  agitated,  and 
asked  that  the  proofs  might  be  returned  to  him.  They  were  of  a 
compromising  nature,  and  "  from  what  he  knew  of  the  etched  work 
which  I  called  my  own,  he  was  determined  I  should  not  take  them 
to  England  with  me.  He  wrote  to  the  Editor  of  the  Ga^zette 
des  Beaux-Arts  to  caution  him  against  being  taken  in  by  me,  and 
to  impart  to  him  the  conviction  that  the  plates,  which  I  pretended 
to  have  done,  were  not  done  by  me  at  all,  or  even  in  that  century, 
but  that  doubtless  I  had  discovered  and  bought  them,  and  signed  and 
adopted  them  as  my  own." 

So  passed  the  final  years  of  this  strange  genius.  He  worked 
intermittently  upon  his  plates.  He  received  a  commission  from  the 
Museum  of  the  Louvre.  He  etched  feeble  reminiscences  of  his  early 
travels  in  the  South  Seas.     They  bear  no  sign  of  the  power  of  the 

21 


CHARLES  MERYON 

creator  of  the  "Eaux  fortes  sur  Parts.  His  mental  disease  increased, 
and  his  behaviour  became  erratic  in  the  extreme.  Some  days  he 
believed  that  the  Jesuits  were  trying  to  entrap  him.  His  most 
enthusiastic  admirers  were  called  thieves  and  rascals,  and  he  refused 
to  have  further  dealings  with  his  best  friends. 

Many  years  later  (in  January  1880),  Sir  Francis  wrote  a  letter 
concerning  Meryon  and  his  relations  in  England.  It  was  published 
in  the  Athenaum. 

"  I  am  in  receipt  of  a  courteous  communication,**  writes  the  celebrated  surgeon, 
"  from  Dr.  Meryon,  the  cousin  of  Charles  Mdryon,  \rhich  gives  me  the  assurance  that 
the  penury  in  which,  to  all  appearance,  Meryon  lived  and  died,  was  in  a  great  measure 
self-imposed,  and  in  no  sense  an  indication  that  he  was  either  forgotten  or  disowned  by 
those  near  of  kin  to  him.  Dr.  Meryon  is  good  enough  to  explain — and  with  his  per- 
mission I  hasten  to  make  this  explanation  public — that  Charles  M^ryon*s  father  (the 
London  physician  alluded  to  by  writers,  myself  among  them)  was  for  forty  years — four- 
fifths  of  Meryon's  lifetime — in  Syria  with  Lady  Hester  Stanhope,  and  therefore  unable 
to  see  his  son  ;  but  that  his  comforts  and  interests  were  constantly  looked  after  by  a 
sister  who  was  much  attached  to  him,  while  he,  the  present  Dr.  Meryon,  himself,  never 
failed  to  visit  him,  or  to  supply  such  few  wants  as  he  could  be  brought  to  confess  to 
whenever  occasion  took  him  to  Paris  ;  in  a  word,  that  the  difficulty  of  doing  much  for 
him  rested,  as  we  may  well  suppose  was  the  case,  mainly  with  poor  Meryon  himself.** 

This  last  sentence  probably  sums  up  the  truth,  but  there  is  one  flaw 
in  the  statement  which  remained  uncorrected.  Lady  Hester  Stan- 
hope left  England  for  the  East  in  18 10,  and  she  died  at  Djouni  in 
1839.  Dr.  Meryon  was  not  with  her  during  the  whole  of  these 
twenty-nine  years,  and  when  he  returned,  to  practise  as  a  London 
physician,  Charles  Meryon  had  nearly  thirty  years  to  live.  Judging 
from  the  letters  previously  quoted,  Meryon  was  not  on  good  terms 
with  this  unknown  sister.  A  quarter  of  a  century  has  elapsed  since 
this  letter  was  written,  and  these  varying  facts  cannot  now  be 
verified. 

To  describe  Meryon's  doings  is  to  recapitulate  the  disordered 
fancies  of  a  maniac.  On  October  12,  1866,  he  was  again  taken  to 
Charenton.  To  a  certain  degree  he  recovered,  and  worked,  like  a  docile 
child,  upon  the  coppers  which  were  placed  before  him.  One  recrea- 
tion was  to  write  long  and  incoherent  letters.  In  1 867  he  was  so  much 
better  that  a  doctor  accompanied  him  to  the  Universal  Exhibition, 
where  several  of  his  etchings  were  to  be  seen.  A  violent  storm 
broke  out  and  finally  shattered  his  reason.  He  did  not  recover  from 
the  relapse.  He  believed  himself  to  be  Christ  held  captive  by  the 
Pharisees.  There  was  not  enough  food  in  the  world,  and  he  would 
not  wrong  the  poor  by  taking  their  sustenance.  He  refused  to  eat, 
and,  on  February  14,  1868,  died  of  exhaustion  brought  on  by 
starvation. 
22 


CHARLES  MERYON 

A  few  days  later  his  body  was  laid  in  the  cemetery  of  Charenton- 
Saint-Maurice.  A  large  brass,  engraved  by  Bracquemond,  serves  as 
his  memorial.  Upon  it  were  drawn  the  tools  of  his  art,  and  an 
adaptation  of  his  own  etching  of  the  arms  of  Paris.  No  better 
symbolism  could  have  been  imagined  for  the  resting-place  of  such  a 
true  Parisian. 

Ill 

Meryon's  renown  as  an  etcher  rests  chiefly  upon  his  Paris  set. 
With  the  exception  of  a  few  other  subjects,  his  minor  work  is 
interesting  only  because  it  comes  from  his  hand.  When  we  examine 
the  Paris  set  we  find  them  notable  for  two  separate  qualities. 
Technically  they  represent  the  highest  mastery  an  etcher  can  com- 
mand over  his  materials  ;  artistically  they  possess  a  mysterious 
atmosphere  which  few  etchers  have  sufficient  personal  temperament 
to  feel. 

Mr.  Ruskin  once  said  that  etching  was  a  bewildering  art. 
Meryon's  proofs  refute  this  extraordinary  remark  immediately. 
The  etcher's  needle  is  one  of  the  most  slippery  of  instruments,  but 
Meryon  was  able  to  control  it  with  unfaihng  exactitude.  He  was 
always  sure  of  his  hand  whether  it  guided  the  needle  or  the  graver. 
He  knew  exactly  where  to  set  his  lines,  and  how  to  place  them. 
Mr.  Ruskin,  in  one  of  his  books,  speaks  somewhat  disrespectfully  or 
the  "  Art  of  Scratch."  In  early  impressions  of  Meryon's  best  plates 
there  is  not  an  unnecessary  scratch,  although  his  nervous  restlessness 
spoilt  the  later  states  of  some  of  his  finest  plates.  La  Tour  de  /'  Horloge, 
a  magnificent  piece  of  drawing,  was  perfect  as  a  composition  until  he 
broke  it  up  with  long  shafts  of  streaming  light.  Although  he  had 
all  the  craftsman's  passionate  love  for  technique  and  the  joy  of  owning 
complete  command  over  his  tools,  yet  Meryon  neverallowed  technique 
and  mere  sleight  of  hand  to  overwhelm  his  art.  A  friend  said  that 
he  was  "  the  most  downright  honest  fellow  in  the  world."  These 
words  can  be  applied  to  his  etchings,  which  are  examples  of  true 
work,  without  the  slightest  afl^ectation. 

Even  higher  than  his  technical  accomplishment  was  his  poetical 
imagination,  which  enabled  him  to  draw  architecture  in  a  manner 
no  artist  has  rivalled.  In  his  etchings  of  Paris  the  very  stones  seem 
to  breathe.  Paris  is  not  a  town,  said  D'Herisson  years  ago ;  it  is  a 
living  being,  with  moments  of  fury,  folly,  stupidity,  enthusiasm, 
honesty,  and  purity.  Meryon  was  not  the  first  man  to  find  this  out. 
Balzac,  a  clear-headed  student,  refers    to    it    in    his  "  Histoire  de 

23 


CHARLES   MERYON 

Treize."  The  streets  of  Paris,  he  wrote,  have  human  qualities. 
Their  physiognomy  impresses  us  with  ideas  we  cannot  contend 
against ;  some  streets  provoke  a  sensation  of  nervous  melancholy. 
In  the  words  of  Robert  Louis  Stevenson,  "  certain  old  houses  demand 
to  be  haunted." 

Identical  feelings  swept  across  Meryon's  mystical  temperament, 
and,  being  a  rare  artist,  he  was  able  to  interpret  them  fully.  He 
lived  in  the  past,  and  for  the  past.  The  glories  of  the  Second  Empire 
had  no  attraction  for  him.  Probably  he  detested  it,  more  for  the 
ravages  of  Baron  Haussmann  than  for  the  bloodshed  of  the  coup  d'etat. 
He  was  not  an  adherent  to  the  Napoleonic  cause.  For  him,  the 
national  banner  still  flew  emblazoned  with  the  lilies  of  France,  and, 
in  his  existence,  St.  Louis  was  no  dead  saint,  but  a  living  reality. 

Dr.  Gachot  said  that  Meryon  was  frequently  absent-minded  when 
in  company.      His  dreams  transported  him  to  another  age.      In  Mr. 
Wedmore's  little  book  upon  the  etchings  are  a  few  lines  which  reveal 
at  a  glance  Meryon's  outlook  towards  modern  life.     Practically  he 
was  hardly  cognisant  of  it.     M.  Jules  Andrieu  was  introduced  to  him 
in  the  winter  of  1 8  60-61.     Taking  up  an  early  impression  of  he 
Stryge,  Meryon  said  :       "  You  can't  tell  why  my  comrades,  who  know 
their  work  better  than  I  do,  fail  with  the  Tower  of  St.  Jacques.      It 
is  because  the  modern  square  is  the  principal  thing  for  them,  and  the 
Middle  Age  tower  an  accident.      Even  if  they  saw,  as   I  see,  an 
enemy  behind  each  battlement  and  arms  through  each    loophole  ; 
if  they  expected,  as  I  do,  to  have  the  boiling  oil  and  the  molten  lead 
poured  down  on  them,  they  would  do  far  finer  things  than  I  can  do. 
For  often  I  have  to  patch  my  plate  so  much  that  I  ought  indeed  to 
be  a  tinker.     My  comrades  are  sensible  fellows.     They  are  never 
haunted  by  this  fellow  {Le  Stryge).     The  monster  is  mine,  and  that  of 
the  men  who  built  this  Tower  of  St.  Jacques.     He  means  stupidity, 
cruelty,  lust,  hypocrisy,  they  have  all  met  in  that  beast."    On  another 
occasion  Meryon  took  his  copy  of  an  old  illuminated  drawing  to  M. 
Arnauldet  and  M.  de  Montaiglon  at  the  Louvre.     The  print  repre- 
sented Louis  XL  surrounded  by  his  court,  receiving  a  presentation 
copy  of  a  book.     One  of  the  officials  complimented  Meryon  upon 
his  skill,  and  also  for  the  marvellous  exactness  with  which  he  had 
reproduced  the  mediaeval  sentiment  of  the  drawing.     Meryon  replied 
with  a  flood  of  explanation,  which  lasted  over  an  hour.     Naturally 
he  could  reproduce  the  feeling  of  such  work.     He  had  lived  with 
these  people.     He  knew  all  that  was  said,  all  that  was  done,  by  each 
of  the  personages.     He  knew  their  friendships,  their  hatreds,  every 
detail  of  their  lives. 
24 


CHARLES   MERYON 

"  Nothing  was  more  foolish  than  the  story  he  told  us,"  relates 
M.  Anatole  de  Montaiglon.  "  But  nothing  was  more  explicit.  It 
was  clear  and  living,  with  a  rough  eloquence,  full  of  sparkle,  and 
always  remarkably  intelligent.  We  said  nothing.  To  approve  was 
to  encourage  ;    to  contradict  was  to  exasperate." 

In  other  words,  Meryon  was  a  visionary.  So  was  Blake,  who, 
in  character  and  disposition,  was  of  a  similar  type.  His  biographer, 
Gilchrist,  specifically  mentions  the  influence  of  "  the  spirit  of  the 
past,"  which  enabled  his  dreaming  eye  to  see  palpable  shapes  from 
the  phantom  past.  As  a  boy  he  had  seen  such  crowds  of  angels' 
that  their  wings  bespangled  every  bough  with  stars,  and  this  power 
of  seeing  visions  strengthened  with  years.  Blake  made  a  careful 
distinction  between  ghosts  and  visionary  beings.  "  Ghosts  did  not 
appear  much  to  imaginative  men,  but  only  to  common  minds,  who 
did  not  see  the  finer  spirits.  A  ghost  was  a  thing  seen  by  the  gross 
bodily  eye  ;  a  vision  by  the  mental."  Applied  to  Meryon,  these 
words  have  much  signification. 

As  Blake  drew  his  visions  upon  his  plates,  so  did  Meryon.  They 
were  sketched  in  pencil  above  the  Pont-au-Change.  They  are  to  be 
found  in  certain  states  of  the  College  Henri  IF.,  and  the  Rue  de  rEcole 
de  Medecine,  In  the  small  Ministere  de  la  Marine,  troops  of  aerial 
horsemen  ride  across  the  sky  of  the  Place  de  la  Concorde.  Critics 
explain  that  these  plates  have  been  spoilt  by  their  author's  insanity. 
Was  it  always  insanity  ?  We  accept  visions  at  Patmos,  but  deny 
them  at  Paris.  The  opinion  of  mankind  as  to  the  supernatural  is 
a  shifting  one.  The  visionary  is  generally  called  a  fool,  although 
often,  in  the  phrase  of  M.  de  Montaiglon,  he  is  "  remarkably 
intelligent."  The  human  race  has  always  had  a  suspicion  that  some 
minds  can  read  the  future.  One  day  we  may  awake  to  the  discovery 
that  some  eyes  can  see  the  past  possessing  an  additional  sense  only 
allotted  to  the  rarest  temperaments. 

This  palpable  atmosphere  of  the  past  forms  an  essential  part  ot  all 
Meryon's  etchings  of  Paris.  Living  alone  he  brooded  over  life  in  all 
its  aspects,  and  noting  only  its  darker  aspects,  was  not  pleased  with 
the  cosmic  order.  Had  he  lived  a  few  years  later  he  would  probably 
have  revisited  New  Caledonia  in  the  company  ot  so  many  other 
French  dreamers  as  a  convict  Communist.  He  had  been  a 
philosopher  from  the  beginning,  and  his  sympathies  had  always 
been  with  the  weak  and  downtrodden.  At  Akaroa  he  sketched 
a  little  mushroom,  afterwards  etched  with  the  title  of  Le  Malingre 
Cryptogame.  Ephemeral,  distorted,  and  puny,  he  said  that  it 
seemed  entirely  typical  of  the  inclemency,  and  at  the  same  time 

25 


CHARLES  MERYON 

the    whimsicality   of  an  incomplete  and    sickly  creation.     In  this 
respect  he  differed  from  Blake,  who  wrote  of  another  fragile  plant : 

"  I  am  a  waterjr  weed, 
And  I  am  very  small,  and  love  to  dwell  in  lowly  vales ; 
So  weak,  the  gilded  butterfly  scarce  perches  on  my  head. 
Yet  I  am  visited  from  heaven." 

Meryon  could  never  have  written  the  last  sentence. 

As  historical  documents  Meryon's  original  etchings  of  Paris  and 
Bourges  have  an  exceeding  value.  It  is  difficult  to  re-create  the 
Europe  of  a  century  ago.  We  can  only  do  it  with  the  aid  of  such 
men  as  Samuel  Prout  and  other  artists,  who,  like  Turner,  travelled 
across  the  Continent  sketching  every  ruin  or  decayed  timber  gable 
which  caught  their  fancy.  Since  those  days  the  spirit  of  commerce 
has  vulgarised  the  old  world,  particularly  in  its  large  towns.  Old 
buildings  have  been  restored  or  destroyed,  almost  an  identical  fate. 
An  electrical  generating  station  represents  the  materialistic  energy  of 
the  twentieth  century.  There  are  many  who  can  sigh,  as  Meryon 
sighed,  for  the  time  when  the  spirit  of  the  age  was  reproduced  in  a 
fa9ade  at  Amiens,  or  a  spire  at  Antwerp.  In  the  present  resistless 
whirl  even  the  gasometer  is  becoming  picturesquely  old-fashioned, 
and  assuming  a  genteel  air  of  antiquity.  The  few  towns  still 
enriched  with  the  great  work  of  wonderful  craftsmen  are  desecrated 
by  mobs  of  foreign  tourists,  who  disturb  the  charm  of  ancient  streets 
with  an  ignorant  knowledge. 

Meryon  had  a  foreboding  of  the  changes  which  were  about  to 
come,  and  he  tried  to  preserve  some  remembrance  of  the  things  that 
were  dear  to  him.  Concerning  Bourges,  he  wrote  :  "  I  found  in 
the  streets,  on  the  outsides  of  the  houses,  most  curious  effects  of  con- 
struction, principally  of  a  kind  which  is  rapidly  disappearing,  because 
it  is  not  counted  of  sufficient  importance  to  be  either  restored  or 
preserved."  It  must  have  been  with  mingled  feelings  that  he 
witnessed  the  inroads  Baron  Haussmann  made  into  the  rookeries  of 
his  cherished  city.  Had  Meryon  possessed  good  health,  and  received 
proper  encouragement,  Paris  might  now  own  an  amazing  portfolio 
of  topographical  prints,  which  would  also  be  a  miracle  of  art. 

One  has  only  to  compare  Meryon's  work  with  that  of  Martial- 
Pothement,  an  industrious  etcher  who  left  over  three  hundred  etch- 
ings of  old  Paris,  to  discover  the  difference  between  the  interpretation 
of  a  genius  and  that  of  a  clever  mediocrity.  Not  once  did  Martial 
rise  to  the  simple  dignity  of  Meryon's  best  work.  Never  did  he 
catch  Meryon's  atmosphere  of  mysterious  suggestion,  which  is  so 
subtly  conveyed  in  the  Rue  des  Mauvais  Garpns,  or  La  Morgue, 
26 


CHARLES  MERYON 

Meryon  took  few  of  the  liberties  with  his  subjects  which  a  poetical 
landscape  painter  thinks  necessary.  He  forced  the  colour  in  some  of 
the  etchings,  making  the  buildings  appear  darker  than  they  actually 
are.  The  name  Lutetia  refers  to  the  whiteness  of  the  houses,  and 
Paris  has  not  changed  in  this  respect.  His  wonderful  etching  of  the 
Morgue  can  be  placed  by  the  side  of  an  interesting  print,  artistically 
valueless,  published  in  1848.  The  "  chapelle  ardente"  of  misfortune 
and  crime  (according  to  Charles  Nodier),  and  the  surrounding 
houses,  are  as  Meryon  drew  them.  One  print  has  the  expressionless 
exactitude  of  a  photograph  ;  the  other  has  the  sombre  imagination 
of  a  grim  line  of  poetry. 

"  I  hope  these  drawings  will  fix  your  imagination  on  the  things  of 
the  past,"  wrote  Meryon  to  Baudelaire.  This  is  the  artist's  message 
to  those  who  are  interested  in  his  work.  As  to  his  character, 
each  man  must  form  his  own  opinion.  We  cannot  tell  how  genius 
is  formed,  or  why  one  should  be  gifted  and  not  another,  but  some  of 
its  manifestations  are  explainable.  Meryon's  peculiar  temperament 
was  the  result  of  his  environment  and  his  physical  condition.  In  the 
ideal  future,  which  Mr.  H.  G.  Wells  and  M.  Anatole  France  are  so 
busily  imagining  for  us,  there  appears  to  be  no  place  for  the  weak  or 
the  unfit.  They  will  not  be  allowed  to  exist.  Happiness  will  be  at 
the  beck  of  all,  suffering  will  be  reduced  to  a  minimum.  Relieved 
from  the  necessity  of  toiling  for  bread,  even  the  old  will  kick  up 
their  heels  and  skip  like  young  lambs.  The  picture  is  an  alluring 
one,  but  this  ideal  community  will  lack  some  things  we  find  worth 
possessing.  It  will  have  no  great  poetry,  no  great  music,  no  great 
art.  In  this  grave  world,  the  finest  creative  art  is  generally  the  fruit 
of  personal  pain  and  private  grief  Its  authors  have  paid  for  it  in 
agony  and  neglect.  Meryon's  wonderful  art,  as  with  that  of  so  many 
poets,  painters,  and  musicians,  was  founded  upon  suffering.  When 
death  released  him  in  the  madhouse  at  Charenton,  his  soul  joined 
those  who,  like  him,  had  already  found  this  life  overflowing  with 
bitterness.  "Joy  and  gladness,  these  shall  be  their  portion, and  tears 
and  sighing  shall  flee  from  them." 


27 


A  LIST  OF  THE  ETCHINGS 
OF  CHARLES  MERYON 


In  this  list  b  stands  for  the  catalogue  of  M.  Philippe  Burty, 

and  w  for  that  of  Mr.  Frederick  Wedmore. 

With  the  exception  of  the  Paris  set,  which  follows  the 

published  sequence,  the  order  is  chronological. 


EARLY   WORK.     1 849-1 850 

COPIES  OF  MASTERS 

1.  The  Holy  Face  b  i     w  78 

This  was  M6ryon's  first  etching,  from  a  miniature  after  a  painting  by 
Philippe  de  Champaigne.  M.  Burty  wrote  that  he  had  seen  a  copy, 
which  is  now  in  America. 

2.  The  Cow  and  the  Young  Ass  b  2     w  63 

After  de  Loutherbourg.  There  are  two  states,  the  second  being  smaller, 
with  the  signature,  C.  M.  d*aprh  de  Loutherbourg. 

3.  EwE  AND  Two  Lambs  b,  page  34     w  62 

Published  on  the  same  page  as  "  South  Sea  Fishers,*  in  "  L*Artiste  "  for 
December,  1861.  Mr.  Wedmore  calls  it  a  copy  after  A.  Van  de  Velde, 
but  "L'Artiste"  says  it  is  after  Adrien  Van  Ostade. 

4.  The  Sheep  and  the  Flies  b  5     w  64 

5.  The  Three  Pigs  before  a  Stable  b  6    w  65 

6.  Two  Horses  b  7     w  66 

These  three  prints  are  reversed  copies  from  Karel  du  Jardin.  Each  one  is 
signed  C.  M.  d'aprh  K.  D.  J, 

7.  A  Soldier  (full  face)  b  3     w  67A 

After  Salvator  Rosa. 

8.  A  Soldier  (in  profile)  w  67 

After  Salvator  Rosa 

9.  A  Shepherd  b  4 

After  Stephano  della  Bella 

10.  A  Shepherdess  w  67B 

29 


A  LIST  OF  THE  ETCHINGS  OF  CHARLES  MERYON 

11.  The  Galliot  of  Jan  de  Vyl  at  Rotterdam  b  12    w  72 

Three  states:  (i)  before  house  on  bank,  and  before  initials,  (ii)  with 
initials,  before  the  angles  of  copper  plate  rounded  off,  (iii)  signed  C.  M. 
(Tapris  Zeemariy  with  angles  rounded. 

12.  From  Haarlem  to  Amsterdam  b  13    w  73 

Two  states,  the  second  having  the  angles  of  the  plate  rounded. 

13.  South  Sea  Fishers  b  14    w  75 

Two  states :  (i)  signed  C.  M.  cTapres  Zeeman ;  (ii)  as  published  in 
"L'Artiste"  in  1861,  with  signature  Meryon  in  full. 

14.  Calais  to  Flushing  b  15     w  74 

Two  states  :  (i)  angles  of  plate  square,  (ii)  angles  or  plate  rounded. 
These  four  preceding  plates   are   reversed  copies  of  Renier  Zeeman's 
set  entitled  Recueil  de  plusieurs  navires  et  paysages  faits  cPaprh  U  naturely 
published  about  1650. 

15.  A  Water-mill  near  Saint  Denis  b  10    w  70 

16.  The  River  Seine,  and  the  Angle  de  Mail  at  Paris  b  ii     w  71 

1 7.  Entrance  of  the  Faubourg  Saint  Marceau  at  Paris  b  9    w  69 

18.  The  Pavilion  of  Mademoiselle,  and  a  Part  of  the  Louvre 

AT  Paris  b  8     w  68 

These  etchings  were  done  after  those  by  Renier  Zeeman,  published  at 
Amsterdam  by  Clement  de  Jonghe  about  1650,  entitled  Fues  de  Paris  et 
de  ses  environs.  These  plates,  particularly  the  last,  suggested  to  M6ryon 
the  idea  of  his  own  Paris  set.  They  are  signed  C.  M.j  or  C.  Meryon 
aprh  Zeeman, 

19.  Le  Pont-au-Change,  about  1784  b  20     w  28 

To  the  left,  above  the  houses,  the  Tower  or  St.  Jacques.  M.  Burty 
mentions  a  trial  proof,  before  the  sky,  and  three  states  :  (i)  before  the  rope, 
(ii)  with  the  rope,  but  before  lettering,  (iii)  as  published.  Mr.  Wedmore 
mentions  two,  (i)  before  letters,  rare,  (ii)  as  published.  A  trial  proof  was 
sold  in  i860  at  a  sale  for  14  francs. 

ORIGINAL  WORK.    THE  PARIS  SET.     1851-1854 

20.  Eaux-fortes  sur  Paris,  par  C.  Meryon,  MDCCCLII  b  31     w  i 

The  cover  for  the  Paris  set.  Printed  on  grey  paper,  and  representing  a 
block  of  limestone  from  the  Montmartre  quarries.     One  state  only. 

21.  "A  Reinier,  Dit  Zeeman,  Peintre  et  Eau-fortier"  b  32     w  2 

Forty-two  lines  of  verse,  forming  a  dedication  to  the  painter  whose 
works  had  inspired  Meryon  to  commence  his  etchings  of  old  Paris.  One 
state  only. 

22.  Old  Gateway  of  the  Palais  de  Justice  b  33     w  3 

Frontispiece  to  the  set,  with  an  inscription  on  the  banneret,  Eaux-fortes  sur 
Paris  par  Meryon.  Burty  has  three  states  :  (i)  before  publication  line,  on 
same  plate  as  "  Tombeau  de  Moli^re,"  (ii)  before  letters,  which  is 
Wedmore's  first  state,  (iii)  as  published,  Wcdmore'a  second  state. 

30 


A  LIST  OF  THE  ETCHINGS  OF  CHARLES  MERYON 

23.  "  Qu'Ame  pure  rougisse  "  B  34      w  4 

Verses  on  Paris,  beginning  with  this  line. 

24.  Arms  Symbolical  of  the  City  of  Paris  b  35       w  5 

Trial  proofs  before  letters,  and  then  publication  state. 

25.  "  FlUCTUAT    NEC    MERGITUR "  B  36         W  6 

A  variation  of  the  arms  of  the  city.  M.  Burty  says  that  M^ryon  did 
not  obtain  permission  to  publish  this  etching,  which  seemed  to  hint  at  the 
terrorism  of  the  Empire.  A  woodcut,  with  variation,  appeared  in  the 
Gaxette  des  Beaux- JrtSy  1864,  and  was  repeated  on  a  Paris  Guide  published 
in  1867. 

26.  Le  Stryge  b  37       w  7 

The  tower  is  St.  Jacques,  the  distant  hill,  Montmartre.       Four  states :  (i) 
with  initials  C,  M.y  (ii)  with  the  verse,  in  Gothic  letters, 
"  Insatiable  Vampire,  Teternelle  Luxure 
Sur  la  Grande  Cite  convoite  sa  pdture." 
(iii)  the  verse  omitted,  (iv)  printer's  address  added.     Wedmore's  first  state 
is  Burty's  second. 

27.  Le  Petit  Pont  b  38       w  8 

"The  towers  of  Notre  Dame  are  much  too  high,  regard  being  had  to 
their  real  dimensions  and  the  laws  of  perspective." — Burty.  There  are 
four  states :  (i)  before  any  lettering,  (ii)  CM.  in  upper  right  corner,  (iii)  with 
title,  puh/i^  par  rartiste^  and  printer's  name  and  address,  (iv)  with  title 
in  capitals,  date  iSso.,  and  the  number  2.  M.  Burty  makes  five  states, 
inserting  after  (ii)  the  same  state  with  omitted  dry-point  marks. 
Wedmore's  first  state  agrees  with  the  second  mentioned  here. 

28.  L'Arche  du  Pont  Notre  Dame  b  39      w  9 

The  first  of  the  set,  having  been  commenced  by  Mdryon  in  1850.  Three 
states  :  (i)  "with  cross-hatching  on  the  underside  of  arch,"  mentioned  by 
M.  Burty  only,  (ii)  artist's  name  and  address  with  date  ;  this  is  Wedmore's 
first  state,  (iii)  printer's  name  and  address  added,  also  initials  C.  M. 
Mr.  Wedmore  mentions  a  state  with  C.  M.  alone.  M6ryon  at  first  used 
a  mechanical  appliance  in  making  the  sketch,  but  the  results  were  useless. 
**  A  photograph  neither  ought,"  said  he,  "  nor  can  enable  an  artist  to 
dispense  with  a  drawing.  It  can  only  aid  him,  while  he  works  by 
assurance  and  confirmation,  by  suggesting  to  him  the  general  character 
of  the  actuality  which  he  has  studied,  and  often  by  discovering  to  him 
minor  details  which  he  had  overlooked.  But  it  can  never  replace  studies 
with  the  pencil." 

29.  La  Galerie  de  Notre  Dame  b  40    w  10 

The  following  states  :  (i)  In  the  left  corner  C.  Miryon  del.  sculp.^  i8s3y 
in  the  right.  Imp.  Rue  N'  St.-Etienne-du-Mont,  26  (M.  Burty  chronicles  an 
earlier  state,  which  he  numbers  as  the  first),  (ii)  address  omitted,  monogram, 
title.  La  Galerie  N.D.y  and  five  jackdaws  added,  (iii)  printer's  name  and 
address  added,  and  number  "4."  The  view  from  this  window  is 
described  by  Victor  Hugo  in  "  Notre  Dame  dc  Paris,"  the  chapter  being 
that  entitled  "  Paris  k  vol  d'oiseau.'* 

c  31 


A  LIST  OF  THE  ETCHINGS  OF  CHARLES  MERYON 

30.  "La  Rue  des  Mauvais  Gar^ons"  b  41     w  11 

Formed  the  tail-piece  to  the  first  part  of  the  set.  Three  states : 
(i)  before  letters,  (ii)  with  artist's  name  and  address,  (iii)  with  verses  added. 

31.  La  Tour  de  l'Horloge  b  42    w  12 

The  Palais  de  Justice  stretching  along  the  Quai  des  Orfevres,  the  bridge 
being  the  Pont-au-Change.  M.  Burty  quotes  a  state  in  which  the  dry- 
point  work  in  the  sky  is  incompleted.  Then  follow  (i)  the  completed 
plate  before  letters,  (ii)  initials  C.  M.  added,  (iii)  title  and  address  of 
printer,  (iv)  title  in  capitals.  There  were  several  changes  in  this  plate,  for 
M^ryon  broke  up  the  composition  by  making  long  beams  of  light  strike 
across  the  plate,  the  river  front  being,  in  his  opinion,  "  too  uniformly 
dark  and  devoid  of  interest."  He  also  modified  the  bridge,  and  removed 
some  of  the  shops  of  the  Pont  Neuf.  The  bell  in  this  tower  gave  the 
second  signal  for  the  massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew. 

32.  {Frontispiece)  Tourelle,  Rue  de  la  Tixeranderie  b  43    w  13 

This  tourelle,  built  at  the  angle  of  the  Rue  du  Coq,  was  demolished  in 
1851.  Three  states:  (i)  before  letters,  (ii)  with  initials  C  M.,  Wedmore's 
first  state,  (iii)  with  title,  printer's  address,  and  the  number  6, 

33.  Saint-Etienne-du-Mont  b  44    w  14 

The  portico  of  the  church  as  seen  between  the  College  du  Montaigu  (now 
demolished)  and  the  Panthdon.  The  plate  was  much  altered  in  its  details. 
M.  Rurty  chronicles  four  states,  Mr.  Wedmore  five :  (i)  with  initials 
C.  M.,  (ii,  iii)  different  actions  of  the  workmen  on  the  scaffolding,  (iv) 
title  on  the  stones  of  the  Pantheon  (this  is  M.  Burty's  third  state),  (v) 
the  words  added,  Pancien  CoUige  de  {Montaigu^  also  printer's  name  and 
address. 

34.  La  Pompe  Notre  Dame.     1852  b  45     w  15 

(i)  Artist's  name  and  address  with  date,  1852,  in  pure  etching,  the  lettering 
reversed,  (ii)  lettering  re-engraved,  and  plate  touched  up  with  the  burin, 
this  state  not  mentioned  by  Mr.  Wedmore,  (iii)  title  added  with  printer's 
name  and  address,  (iv)  title  in  capitals  with  number  5,  (v)  C.  M.  instead 
of  C.  Meryon,  "  His  pleasure  in  constructive  work,  however  humble,  is 
shown  by  his  close  and  careful  following  of  the  woodwork  in  its  darkest 
and  furthest  recesses.  His  fame  would  be  assured  if  it  rested  only  on  the 
rendering  of  the  labour  of  men's  hands,  from  the  fretted  roof  of  the 
cathedral  to  the  intricate  timbers  of  the  engine-house." 

35.  La  Petite  Pompe  b  46    w  16 

Frontispiece  to  the  second  part  of  the  Paris  set.  "  The  only  issued  state 
has  Mdryon's  name  and  address,  and  is  very  rare." — Wedmore.  In  the 
catalogue  of  the  Burlington  Fine  Arts  Club  it  is  called  the  tail-piece  to 
the  second  part  of  the  set,  which  appears  inaccurate.  Some  trial  proofs  in 
existence. 

36.  Le  Pont  Neuf  b  47    w  17 

M.  Burty  indicates  several  states  which  appear  to  be  trial  proofs,  (i)  With 
names  of  artist  and  printer,  (ii)  with  eight  verses  (this  is  Mr.  Wedmore's 
first  state),  (iii)  verses  omitted,  (iv)  a  chimney  omitted  and  the  houses 
lowered,  (v)  title  in  capitals,  printer's  name  and  address,  initials  C.  {M.y 

32 


A  LIST  OF  THE  ETCHINGS  OF  CHARLES  MERYON 

date  i8sOf  and  the  figure  g.  Mr.  Hamerton  writes  of  this  plate :  "  When 
M6ryon  comes  to  the  rounding  of  the  far-projecting  cornice  where  the 
gleam  of  sunshine  falls,  he  follows  every  reflection  with  an  indescribable 
pleasure  and  care.  The  wonder  is  how  the  delighted  hand  could  work  so 
firmly  here,  that  it  did  not  tremble  with  the  eagerness  of  its  emotion,  and 
fail  at  the  very  moment  of  fruition." 

37.  Le  Pont-au-Change  b  48     w  18 

On  the  right  is  the  Palais  de  Justice.  M^ryon  made  many  alterations  on 
this  plate.  The  first  published  state  seems  to  be  that  with  the  balloon 
Speranza^  (ii)  a  number  of  small  balloons  added  (this  may  have  been  a  later 
state),  (iii)  all  balloons  omitted,  and  a  crescent  moon  added  with  many 
birds.  There  is  another  state  with  a  balloon  named  Vasco  de  Gama. 
M.  Burty  differentiates  eight  states  and  Wedmore  four.  "  Mdryon 
had  the  idea  that,  at  the  close  of  day,  eagles  and  other  birds  of  prey 
were  let  loose  from  the  Tuileries,  whose  threatening  flight  carried 
trouble  in  the  peaceful  minds  of  the  citizens,  and  recalled  to  them  the 
triumph  of  the  coup  d'ltat  of  1 85 1 ." — Burty. 

38.  L'Esp£rance  b  49     w  19 

A  set  of  verses  to  accompany  Le  Pont-au-Change. 

39.  La  Morgub  b  50    w  20 

M.  Burty  mentions  two  trial  proofs.  There  are  five  states  :  (i)  before  any 
letters,  (ii)  artist's  name  and  address  and  date,  (iii)  lettering  across  the 
faces  of  the  houses,  which  M^ryon  considered  had  a  secret  signification  in 
harmony  with  the  subject ;  the  title  added,  (iv)  address  of  printer  added, 
(v)  Imagerie  religieme^  exportation  added  to  inscription  across  the  houses. 

40.  L'HOTELLERIE    DE    LA    MoRT  '  B  5I       W  21 

Eight  verses  to  accompany  the  last  plate. 

'*  Venez,  voyez,  passants  ! 
A  ses  pauvres  enfants 
En  m^re  charitable, 
La  Ville  de  Paris 
Donne  en  tous  temps  gratis, 
Et  le  lit  et  la  table." 

41.  L*Abside  de  Notre  Dame  de  Paris  b  52    w  22 

The  "  noble  basilique"  from  the  Pont  de  la  Tournelle,  on  the  left  the 
Pont-aux-Choux  and  the  Hotel  Dieu.  M.  Burty  mentions  two  existing 
trial  proofs.  Six  states  :  (i)  before  any  letters,  (ii)  artist's  name  and 
address,  (iii)  date  removed,  (iv)  title  inserted,  (v)  title  in  small  capitals 
with  date,  (vi)  M^ryon's  name  added,  with  number  12. 

42.  "O  Fin  D^gustateur  de  Tout  Morceau  Gothique" 

These  verses,  written  upon  a  few  early  proofs  of  the  "  Abside,"  appear  to 
exist  on  a  small  separate  plate,  signed  and  dated.  Not  catalogued  by 
Burty  and  Wedmore. 

43.  Le  Tombeau  de  Moliere  b  53    w  23 

Tailpiece  to  the  set.    One  state  only,  with  Meryon*s  name  and  address. 

33 


A  LIST  OF  THE  ETCHINGS  OF  CHARLES  MlfeRYON 

ORIGINAL  WORK.    185 1-1859 

44.  Doorway  to  an  Old  House  at  Bourges  b  57     w  33 

Etched  in  1851,  and  additional  work  added  in  1864.  This  plate  is 
exceedingly  rare.     Two  states. 

45.  La  Rue  des  Toiles,  Bourges.     1853  b  58    w  35 

M^ryon  wrote  to  M.  Burty  :  "  All  the  upper  portions  of  the  houses  are 
true  to  nature  ;  the  lower  parts  had,  however,  been  so  disfigured  by  modern 
restorations,  that  I  obtained  from  other  quarters  of  the  town  details  which 
would  best  accord  with  the  upper  stories."  Five  states  :  (i)  artist's  name 
and  address,  (ii)  these,  together  with  a  dog,  omitted,  (iii)  a  young  soldier 
and  a  woman  added,  (iv)  title  added,  (v)  printer's  name  added. 

46.  Ancienne  Habitation  a  Bourges  b  59    w  34 

It  was  said  that  this  house  was  built  by  a  musician  who  had  made  his 
fortune.  The  pillar  at  the  angle  is  in  the  shape  of  a  flageolet.  Three 
states :  (i)  before  the  initials  C.  M.  (not  mentioned  by  Mr.  Wedmore), 
(ii)  C.  M.  added,  (iii)  title  added  for  the  Gazette  des  Beaux-Arts, 

47.  Book  Plate  or  Address  Card  for  M.  Rochoux  b  54    w  47 

Printed  in  red  and  black.  M.  Rochoux  was  a  printseller  who  appreciated 
M^ryon's  work.  The  two  figures  represent  the  two  rivers,  the  Seine  and 
the  Marne.  At  the  back  is  the  Palais  de  Justice,  beneath,  the  statue  of 
Henri  IV.  on  the  Pont  Neuf.  Three  states  :  (i)  a  lamp  under  the  arch, 
(ii)  a  boat  replaces  the  lamp,  (iii)  "the  cables  knotted  at  the  lower 
angles." — Burty. 

48.  Entree  du  Couvent  des  Capucins  Fran^ais  a  Athenes  b  16     w  32 

This  etching  forms  the  frontispiece  to  the  Count  L.  de  Laborde's 
*' Athenes  aux  xv.,  xvi.  et  xvii.  siecles."  Paris,  1854.  Poor  Meryon's 
name  is  spelt  wrongly  in  each  instance  in  this  book,  where  the  etching  is 
described  as  being  after  an  engraving  by  le  Roy.  The  Choraic  Monument 
of  Lysicrates  now  stands  detached.  Meryon  had  sketched  it  during  his 
voyage,  and  M.  Burty  states  that  he  was  also  indebted  to  a  photograph. 
There  aretwo  states,  the  first  being  before  letters.  The  plate  is  exceedingly 
rare. 

49.  L'Attelage 

Twenty-six  lines  of  verse,  beginning  "  Un  cheval  se  trainait  triste  et  tctc 
baissde,"  dated  1856.  Exhibited  at  the  Grolier  Club.  Not  catalogued  by 
Burty  or  Wedmore. 

COPIES.     1853-1859 

50.  Plan  of  the  Battle  of  Sinope  b  21     w  79 

Coloured  in  water-colour. 

51.  La  Salle  des  Pas  Perdus  b  17     w  76 

After  Androuet  Ducerceau,  the  architect  of  the  Pont  Neuf.  Meryon 
copied  the  original  plate,  for  which  he  had  much  admiration,  in  1855. 
M.  Burty  notices  three  states :  (i)  before  the  inscription,  (ii)  with  the 
inscription,  and  plate  reduced  in  size,  (iii)  with  the  inscription  and  the 
printer's  name  and  address,  the  copper  having  been  cut  below  marginal  line 
at  bottom.     The  first  Wedmore  state  includes  the  inscription. 

34 


A  LIST  OF  THE  ETCHINGS  OF  CHARLES  MERYON 

52.  Le  Pont  Neuf  et   la   Samaritaine   vus   au-dessous   de  la  PREMiiRE 

ARCHE   DU    PoNT-AU-ChANGE  B  I9      W  29 

The  arch  in  the  foreground  is  that  of  the  Pont-au-Change.  "  Between 
the  houses  which  line  the  Quai  de  la  M^gisserie  and  the  monument  of 
the  Samaritaine,  is  seen  the  angle  of  the  Gallery  d'Apollon,  with  the 
Pavilion  of  Charles  IX," — Burty.  "  This  plate  and  that  of  the  Pont-au- 
Change  were  worked  by  Meryon  after  drawings  by  Nicolle,  but  at  an 
interval  of  five  years ;  this  belonging  to  1855,  while  the  Pont-au-Change 
is  dated  1850." — Catalogue  of  Burlington  Fine  Arts  Club.  The  origin 
of  the  title  of  "  La  Samaritaine  "  is  not  generally  known.  On  the  elevation 
of  the  pumping-station  which  supplied  the  Tuileries  and  the  Louvre  with 
water,  facing  the  bridge,  was  a  sculptured  1  group  of  Jesus  receiving  water 
from  the  Woman  of  Samaria ;  hence  la  Samaritaine.  There  was  also  a 
chiming  clock,  "a  very  rare  dyall  of  several  motions,"  according  to  John 
Evelyn.  Burty  mentions  three  states  :  (i)  delicate  sky,  (ii)  before  lettering, 
marginal  line  completed,  (iii)  with  inscription. 

53.  Chenonceau  b  18     w  77 

Reduced  from  a  plate  by  Ducerceau,  for  a  book  published  in  1856. 

54.  Chenonceau  w  77A 

Another  view  of  the  castle. 

55.  A  View  of  the  City  of  San  Francisco  b  22    w  80 

This  large  plate  (measuring  39  in.  by  9I  in.)  was  a  source  of  great 
trouble  to  Meryon,  who  engraved  it  from  five  photographs  for  two 
bankers,  at  the  price  of  1200  francs.  M.  Burty  says  that  it  hastened  the 
course  of  his  mental  disease. 

56.  The  Ruins  of  the  Chateau  of  Pierrefonds  b  23    w  81 

After  a  sketch  from  nature  by  Viollet  le  Due,  the  architect.  Etched  by 
Mdryon  during  his  first  residence  at  Charenton.  Burty  catalogues  two 
states. 

ORIGINAL  WORK.     1860-1866 

57.  TouRELLE,  Rue  de  l'Ecole  de  M£decine,  22,  Paris.     1861  b  55    w  24 

In  this  house  Marat  was  assassinated  by  Charlotte  Corday,  and  in  the 
earlier  states  there  is  a  symbolical  representation  of  Truth,  Justice  and 
Innocence.  Mr.  Wedmore  mentions  four  states,  M.  Burty  seven. 
Mr.  Wedmore's  first  state  contains  the  title  and  legend,  (ii)  these  are 
altered  and  the  symbolical  figures  disappear,  (iii)  rays  of  light  cross  the  sky, 
and  two  birds  are  added,  (iv)  the  words  Gazette  des  Beaux-Arts  added.  This 
is  M.  Burty*s  seventh  state. 

58.  Rue  des  Chantres.     1862  b  56    w  25 

This  plate  was  destroyed  after  one  hundred  impressions.  A  print  was 
hung  in  the  Salon  of  1863,  but  attracted  no  attention.  M.  Burty  mentions 
four  states,  Mr.  Wedmore  two  :  (i)  before  title,  (ii)  with  title,  date,  and 
printseller's  address.  There  is  a  curious  mistake  in  Mr.  Wedmore's 
description  of  this  print,  as  he  says  the  spire  belongs  to  the  Sainte  Chapelle. 
It  is  that  which  surmounts  the  leaden  roof  of  Notre  Dame,  for  the  Rue  de 
Chantres  runs  in  a  northerly  direction  from  the  church  to  the  Quai-aux- 
Fleurs.  At  a  corner  of  the  ancient  street  lived  Hdloise  and  her  uncle, 
the  Canon  Fulbert.  The  house  which  stood  in  Abelard's  day  has  long 
since  vanished. 


A  LIST  OF  THE  ETCHINGS  OF  CHARLES  MERYON 

59.  College  Henri  IV.    (Two).  1864  b  83    w  58 

There  are  several  states  of  this  magnificent  panoramic  view,  taken  from 
the  top  of  the  Panthi'on.  In  the  last  state  Meryon  engraved  initials  on 
some  of  the  houses, "  memorials  of  his  friendships  and  his  loves.  Thus  we 
have  P.  S.,  i.e.,  Philippon  and  Salicis,  two  of  his  most  intimate  friends,  for 
the  first  of  whom  he  worked  this  plate  in  1864.  Also  D.  N.,  the  initials 
of  one  of  the  ugly  girls  of  whom  poor  Meryon  fancied  himself  at  different 
times  desperately  enamoured."  Burty  gives  four  states,  Wedmore  five. 
States  i-iii  (Burty  and  Wedmore)  contain  a  fantastic  background,  which 
was  replaced  by  houses. 

60.  Bain  froid,  Chevrier,  dit  de  l'Ecole.     1864  b  84    w  27 

There  are  two  states,  the  first  being  before  letters. 

61.  Le  Ministere  de  la  Marine.     1865  b  82     w  26 

Burty  gives  three  states  :  (i)  before  sabre  on  ground,  (ii)  with  monogram 
C.  M.y  (iii)  with  title. 

62.  Le  Pilote  de  Tonga  b  60    w  36 

A  prose  description  of  the  pilot,  with  a  border.  The  second  state  contains 
the  printer's  address. 

63.  Le  Malingre  Cryptogame  b  61     w  37 

A  mushroom  which  Meryon  saw  at  Akaroa.  Burty  mentions  three  states, 
Wedmore  two,  the  last  having  title. 

64.  Head  of  a  New  Holland  Dog  b  62    w  38 

65.  Voyage      de      la     Corvette     "Le     Rhin" — Nouvelle      Zelande. 

Greniers  Indigenes  et  Habitations  A  Akaroa.     1845  b  63    w  39 

Four  states.  The  plate  was  etched  in  i860,  and  a  proof  exhibited  at 
the  Salon  of  1865. 

66.  Grand  Case  Indigene  sur  le  Chemin  de  Ballorde  a  Poepo.   1845  b  64    w  40 

Four  states  mentioned  by  M.  Burty. 

67.  OCi&ANIE— PfiCHE    AUX    PaLMES.       1 845  B  65      W  4I 

Four  states  mentioned  by  Burty. 

68.  PicHE  A  LA  Seine  b  66    w  42 

Three  states  given  by  Burty.  An  impression  of  the  third  state  (with  one 
boat)  was  exhibited  at  the  Salon  of  1 864. 

69.  A  Cover  for  the  New  Zealand  Etchings  b  67     w  46 

Burty  gives  four  states,  but  Wedmore  gives  two,  the  first  being  before 
letters. 

70.  Etat  de  la  Petite  Colonie  Fran9Aise  d'Akaroa.    vers  1845      b  68    w  43 

Trial  proofs  and  published  states. 

71.  PRi- VOLANT  des  Iles  Mulgraves,  Oceanie  b  69    w  45 

72.  La  Chaumiere  du  Colon  w  44 

Trial  proof,  first  state  before  letters,  then  with  title  as  published. 

36 


A  LIST  OF  THE  ETCHINGS  OF  CHARLES  MERYON 

73.  Petit  Prince  Dito  b  70    w  59 

Unintelligible  verse  with  a  slight  figure. 

74.  Rebus— La  Vendetta.     1863  B  77     w  55 

An  anvil  on  a  block,  with  a  woman  washing  the  letter  D  in  a  tub. 

75.  A  Rebus  w  56 

Two  coast  views,  a  coffin,  and  a  horn.     Mr.  Wedmore  says  the  subject  is 
De  Morny. 

76.  A  Rebus — B£ranger  b  78    w  57 

A  bird  and  a  table,  with  verses. 

77.  Design  for  the  Frame  for  a  Printer's  Portrait  b  79    w  54 

A  large  number  of  varying  states. 

78.  Verses  to  M.  Eugene  Blery  b  7  i     w  48 

Sixteen  lines  commencing  "  A  vous,  Bl^ry,  mon  Maftre." 

79.  Verses  to  M.  Eugene  Bl£ry  w  48A 

The  same  verses  on  a  smaller  plate. 

80.  La  Loi  Lunaire  b  72     w  49 

A  mad  arrangement  of  coffin-shaped  boxes,  in  which  mankind,  according 
to  M^ryon,  should  sleep  upright. 

81.  La  Loi  Lunaire  b  73    w  50 

With  a  single  coffin,  instead  of  two. 

82.  La  Loi  Solaire.     1865  b  74    w  51 

On  one  of  these  prints  M^ryon  wrote  "  mais  Tcau  froide,  glacde,  que  j'ai 
oublide,**  a  trace  of  his  morbid  dislike  of  water. 

83-84.  Ideas  to  prevent  the  Forging  of  Banknotes  b  75-76    w  52-53 

85.  Frontispiece    for  a  Catalogue    by  Arnauldet    of    the  Works    of 

Thomas  de  Leu,  the  Engraver  b  80    w  61 

The  lettering  was  not  done  by  Mdryon. 


WORK  PARTLY  ORIGINAL,  BUT  BASED  ON  MATERIAL 
SUPPLIED  BY  OTHERS.     1860-1866 

86.  Rue  Pirouette,  aux  Halles  b  24    w  30 

This  charming  plate  was  etched  after  a  drawing  by  Laurence,  as  M^ryon 
could  no  longer  stand  the  annoyance  of  working  in  the  streets.  We  are 
told  that  the  original  drawing  was  a  very  bad  one,  and  that  the  animation 
is  entirely  M^ryon's.  There  are  five  states :  (i)  before  lettering  (rareX 
(ii)  C.  3i.  et  L.  on  chimney,  with  the  title.  Rue  Pirouette^  i860y  and 
inscription  on  wall  (twenty  impressions  only  were  struck  off),  (iii)  artist's 
and  printer's  names  added,  inscription  on  wall  altered,  (iv)  title  in  full, 
and  C.  3ii,  et  L.  omitted,  (v)  inscription  on  wall  again  altered  and 
"  Laurence  et  M^ryon  "  added  to  left-hand  wall. 

37 


A  LIST  OF  THE  ETCHINGS  OF  CHARLES  M^RYON 

87.  Passerelle  du  Pont-au-Change,  APRis  l'Incendie  de  1621  B  27    w  84 

From  a  drawing  belonging  to  M.  Bonnardot.  M.  Biirty  mentions  six 
states  :  (i-iv)  before  title,  (v)  printed  with  title  in  italics  for  the  Gazette 
des  Beau»-Arts^  which  appeared  in  November  i860,  (vi)  title  in  small 
capitals,  as  published.  Wedmore's  first  and  second  states  correspond  to 
Burty's  fourth  and  fifth. 

88.  Partie  de  la  Cite  de  Paris,  vers  la  Fin  du  XVIIme  Siecle        b  28     w  31 

After  a  drawing  belonging  to  M.  Bonnardot.  Three  states:  (i)  with 
M^ryon's  name  on  an  advertising  board,  with  date,  (ii)  Au  cana  omitted 
on  this  board,  (iii)  the  whole  inscription  on  this  board  omitted,  and  in  its 
place,  Au  repu.  Le  sobre  resta.  Poissons  fr.  "  This  plate  afforded  to 
M6ryon's  friends  one  of  the  most  convincing  proofs  of  his  unfortunate 
malady.  .  .  .  M6ryon  pretended  that  the  towers  of  Notre  Dame,  and  the 
chimneys  of  the  houses,  had  been  effaced  in  the  original  drawing  by  evil- 
disposed  persons,  and  he  insisted  on  placing  them  in  his  etching." — Burty. 

COPIES.     1 860-1 866 

89.  Presentation  to  Louis  XL  of  the  work  "VALiRE  Maxime"  by  its 
Printer.     1475  b  25    w  82 

Facsimile  of  a  miniature  belonging  to  Meryon's  friend,  M.  Niel,  Librarian 
to  the  Minister  of  the  Interior.  M.  Delisle,  Librarian  of  the  National 
Library,  was  of  opinion  that  the  miniature  after  which  the  etching  was 
made  does  not  represent  the  presentation  of  the  book  to  Louis  XI.  Burty 
mentions  two  states,  and  vaguely  writes,  "the  monogram  C.  M. 
constitutes  the  mark  of  a  fourth  state." 

90.  Chevet  de  St.  Martin-sur-Renelle  b  26    w  83 

After  Langlois,  a  Norman  architect.  Two  states.  The  second  state  has 
at  the  head  of  the  plate  the  words  Mimo'ires  de  la  SocUtl  de  Antiquairei  de 
Normandie. 

91.  Le  Grand  Chatelet  a  Paris  b  29    w  85 

After  a  drawing  attributed  to  NicoUe,  but  the  date  is  also  said  to  be  1780. 
The  plate  was  destroyed  after  100  impressions.  Burty's  first  state  seems 
to  be  a  trial  proof ;  his  second  state,  before  letters,  is  Wedmore's  first  state  ; 
final  state,  with  lettering  as  published.  After  one  hundred  impressions 
the  plate  was  destroyed. 

92.  Vue  de  l'ancien  Louvre  du  c6Ti:  de  la  Seine  b  30    w  60 

Etched  after  a  picture  by  Zeeman  in  the  Louvre,  and  completed  just 
before  Mdryon  went  to  Charenton  for  the  second  time.  A  commission 
from  the  French  Government.  Two  states,  the  first  being  before  letters. 
This  etching  appears  to  have  been  included  by  Burty  twice,  Nos.  30  and 
81. 

93.  Portrait  of  M^ryon  b  85 

No  copy  is  known  to  exist. 

94.  Portrait  of  M.  Decourtive  b  86 

95.  Portrait  of  M.  Eugene  Bl£ry  b  87 

After  Buttera.     No  copy  known. 

38 


A  LIST  OF  THE  ETCHINGS  OF  CHARLES  MERYON 

96.  Portrait  of  M.  Casimir  Lecomte  b  88     w  86 

After  Gustave   Boulanger.     Two    states,   the    first    being    before    the 
inscription. 

97.  Portrait  of  Evariste  BoutAY-FATV  b  89     w  87 

After  David  d*Angers.     Three  states. 

98.  Portrait  of  FRAN90IS  Viete  b  90    w  88 

Two  states. 

99.  Portrait  of  Pierre  Nivelle,  Bishop  of  LugoN,  1 584-1600         b  91     w  89 

After  a  print  of  the  period.     Etched  on  tin. 

100.  Portrait  of  Acrippa  d'AubignI  b  92     w  90 

After  a  lithograph. 

1 01.  Portrait  of  Jean  Besley  b  93     w  91 

After  J.  Isaac.     Three  states. 

102.  Portrait  of  Rene  de  Burdigale  b  94     w  92 

After  Crispin  dc  Pas.     Three  states. 

103.  Portrait  of  Arm  and  Guieraud  b  95     w  95 

After  a  photograph. 

104.  Portrait  of  Louis  Jacques  Marie  Bizeul  b  96     w  93 

After  a  photograph.     Four  states  given  by  Burty. 

105.  Portrait  of  Benjamin  Fillon  b  97     w  94 

After  a  photograph.     Two  states  given  by  Burty. 


39 


ILLUSTRATIONS 


PLATE  I 


THE  COW  AND  THE   YOUNG  ASS 


AFTER    DE    LOUTHERBOURG 


PLATE  II 


EWE  AND  TWO  LAMBS 


PLATE  III 


AFTER  ZEEMAN 


THE  GALLIOT  OF  JAN  DE  VYL  OF  ROTTERDAM 


PLATE  IV 


ts^m^ 


FROM  HAARLEM  TO  AMSTERDAM 


AFTER    ZEEMAN 


PLATE  V 


SOUTH  SEA  FISHERS 


AFTER    ZEE MAN 


PLATE  VI 


AFTER    ZEEMAN 


CALAIS  TO  FLUSHING 


w 

H 
< 


2; 

w 

Q 
< 


w 

H 
< 


o 
pq 

^  CO 

fe  Pi 

°§ 

WW 

^^ 

H 
W  c/) 


> 

O 

w 

a: 

H 

O 
H 

an 


Q 


O 
O 


> 

< 
Oh 

H 


H 

o 
m 
< 

o 
o 


PLATE  XI 


OLD  GATEWAY  OF  THE 
PALAIS   DE   JUSTICE 


PLATE  XII 


ARMS  SYMBOLICAL  OF  THE  CITY  OF  PARIS 


PLATE  XIII 


LE  STRYGE 


LE  PETIT  PONT 


< 


Q 

H 
O 

H 
O 

Oh 
P 

Q 
o 

J 


PLATE  XVI 


LA  GALERIE  DE  NOTRE  DAME 


PLATE  XVII 


^  ■'  -v* 


■■^,.  .  ■.■v>.-..-  .;  .v^.;<'^»>: 


•Lii&Lib^llSSffi 


LA  RUE  DES  MAUVAIS  GARfONS 


PLATE  XVI II 


LA  TOUR  DE  L'HORLOGE 


PLATE  XIX 


SAINT- ETIENNE-DU-MONT 


X     ■ 
X      h 


Q 

W 

H 
O 

W 

o 
H-1 


PLATE  XXI 


LE  PONT  NEUF 


X 
X 


w 
o 

U 

H 

IZi 

O 

W 


PLATE  XXIII 


LA  MORGUE 


^'             y 

■y\-; 

CO 

I— I 

<< 

W 
Q 

W 
IS 

<: 

Q 

H 
O 

W 
Q 

W 
Q 

H- ( 

CO 

PQ 

<; 


PLATE  XXV 


DOORWAY  TO  AN  OLD  HOUSE  AT  BOURGES 


PLATE  XXVI 


LA  RUE  DES  TOILES,  BOURGES,    1853 


PLATE  XXVir 


ANCIENNE  HABITATION  A  BOURGES  (THE  xMUSICIAN'S  HOUSE) 


PLATE  XXVIII 


ENTRANCE  TO  THE  CONVENT  OF  THE  FRENCH  CAPUCINES, 
AT  ATHENS 


X 

l-H 

X 
X 

w 

H 

< 
p-i 


Q 
K 
W 

< 
Ah 

w 

W 

h-1 


w 
o 

"A 
< 

u 

< 

H 
"A 
O 

P-, 

P 
Q 

W 
X 
u 

<^. 


PU 


C/3 


Q 


H 
W 

P 

W 

H 

o 


X 

< 


CO 

Q 

o 
w 

p^ 
w 

I— I 

Ph 

o 

<J 
w 

H 

u 

Ui 
H 

O 
(/i 

W 

I! 
H 


PLATE  XXXII 


TOURELLE,  RUE  DE  L'ECOLE  DE  MEDECINE,  22,  PARIS   1861 


PLATE  XXXIII 


RUE  DES  CHANTRES,   1862 


X 
X 

X 

w 

H 
< 


Pi 

w 
X 

o 

-« 
.-1 
1-1 
o 
u 


PLATE  XXXVI 


BAIN  FROID  CHEVRIER,  DIT  DE  L'^COLE,    1864 


PLATE  XXXVII 


v?35??v:^ 


LE  MINISTERE  DE   LA  MARINE,    1865 


> 

X 

y. 
w 

H 

< 

0^ 


O 
Oil 
<ij 

H 

X 
Q 

-< 
pa 

y 
> 

■-H 


2 

W 
S3 


o 
a, 
« 

o 

p 

Q 
2i 
O 
-J 

< 
pq 


O 

w 

o 

H 

a; 

w 
> 


O 
Q 
W 


X 
w 

< 


W 

X 
< 

X 
o 

-a 


w 
u 
o 


o 

fin   <J^ 
C/)  00 


<,  ^  t-i 
WOW 
N  PQ  ^ 

>  <  ^ 


PLATE  XLII 


PR6- VOLANT  DES  ILES  MULGRAVES, 
OCEANIE 


PLATE  XLIII 


FRONTISPIECE  FOR  A  CATALOGUE 
BY  ARNAULDET  OF  THE  WORKS  OF 
THOMAS  DE  LEU,  THE   ENGRAVER 


PLATE  XLIV 


RUE   PIROUETTE,  AUX  HALLES 


w 

Q 
W 
Q 

W 
O 


C/5 

w 
o 

o 

6 
< 

H 

o 


w 

p^ 
w 


u 

-a 


a, 
Q 
H 


Ui 
Q 

W 
I— ( 

H 

< 

a. 


> 

<i1 


> 
w 

H 
< 


w 

w 
Q 

-a 

H 

O 

o 
ID 

Q 

w 

> 
P 
o 

w 
o 

<! 

< 
w 

Q 

W 
> 


j:>